Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework

Contemporary media systems are in transition. The constellation of organizations, groups, and individuals contributing information to national and international news flows has changed as a result of the digital transformation. The 'hybrid media system' has proven to be one of the most inst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JUNGHERR, Andreas, POSEGGA, Oliver, AN, Jisun
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6615
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7618/viewcontent/1940161219841543_pvoa.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-7618
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-76182022-01-14T03:47:24Z Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework JUNGHERR, Andreas POSEGGA, Oliver AN, Jisun Contemporary media systems are in transition. The constellation of organizations, groups, and individuals contributing information to national and international news flows has changed as a result of the digital transformation. The 'hybrid media system' has proven to be one of the most instructive concepts addressing this change. Its focus on the mutually dependent interconnections between various types of media organizations, actors, and publics has inspired prolific research. Yet the concept can tempt researchers to sidestep systematic analyses of information flows and actors’ differing degrees of influence by treating media systems as a black box. To enable large-scale, empirical comparative studies aimed at identifying interdependencies and power relationships in contemporary media systems, we propose the concept of discursive power. This describes the ability of contributors to communication spaces to introduce, amplify, and maintain topics, frames, and speakers, thus shaping public discourses and controversies that unfold in interconnected communication spaces. We also provide a theoretical framework of how structural features of organizations and media systems contribute to the emergence of discursive power for different types of actors in various contexts. This adds to the theoretical toolkit available to researchers interested in the empirical analysis of contemporary media systems. 2019-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6615 info:doi/10.1177/1940161219841543 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7618/viewcontent/1940161219841543_pvoa.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University media systems hybrid media system agenda setting framing discursive power theoretical framework comparative research Film and Media Studies Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic media systems
hybrid media system
agenda setting
framing
discursive power
theoretical framework
comparative research
Film and Media Studies
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
spellingShingle media systems
hybrid media system
agenda setting
framing
discursive power
theoretical framework
comparative research
Film and Media Studies
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
JUNGHERR, Andreas
POSEGGA, Oliver
AN, Jisun
Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework
description Contemporary media systems are in transition. The constellation of organizations, groups, and individuals contributing information to national and international news flows has changed as a result of the digital transformation. The 'hybrid media system' has proven to be one of the most instructive concepts addressing this change. Its focus on the mutually dependent interconnections between various types of media organizations, actors, and publics has inspired prolific research. Yet the concept can tempt researchers to sidestep systematic analyses of information flows and actors’ differing degrees of influence by treating media systems as a black box. To enable large-scale, empirical comparative studies aimed at identifying interdependencies and power relationships in contemporary media systems, we propose the concept of discursive power. This describes the ability of contributors to communication spaces to introduce, amplify, and maintain topics, frames, and speakers, thus shaping public discourses and controversies that unfold in interconnected communication spaces. We also provide a theoretical framework of how structural features of organizations and media systems contribute to the emergence of discursive power for different types of actors in various contexts. This adds to the theoretical toolkit available to researchers interested in the empirical analysis of contemporary media systems.
format text
author JUNGHERR, Andreas
POSEGGA, Oliver
AN, Jisun
author_facet JUNGHERR, Andreas
POSEGGA, Oliver
AN, Jisun
author_sort JUNGHERR, Andreas
title Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework
title_short Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework
title_full Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework
title_fullStr Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework
title_full_unstemmed Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework
title_sort discursive power in contemporary media systems: a comparative framework
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6615
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7618/viewcontent/1940161219841543_pvoa.pdf
_version_ 1770576010395254784