Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction

Code summarization aims at generating a code comment given a block of source code and it is normally performed by training machine learning algorithms on existing code block-comment pairs. Code comments in practice have different intentions. For example, some code comments might explain how the meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHEN, Qiuyuan, XIA, Xin, HU, Han, LO, David, LI, Shanping
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6706
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7709/viewcontent/TOSEM_Qiuyuan_Chen_2021_Why_My_Code_Summarization_Model_Does_Not_Work.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-7709
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-77092022-01-27T11:17:59Z Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction CHEN, Qiuyuan XIA, Xin HU, Han LO, David LI, Shanping Code summarization aims at generating a code comment given a block of source code and it is normally performed by training machine learning algorithms on existing code block-comment pairs. Code comments in practice have different intentions. For example, some code comments might explain how the methods work, while others explain why some methods are written. Previous works have shown that a relationship exists between a code block and the category of a comment associated with it. In this article, we aim to investigate to which extent we can exploit this relationship to improve code summarization performance. We first classify comments into six intention categories and manually label 20,000 code-comment pairs. These categories include “what,” “why,” “how-to-use,” “how-it-is-done,” “property,” and “others.” Based on this dataset, we conduct an experiment to investigate the performance of different state-of-the-art code summarization approaches on the categories. We find that the performance of different code summarization approaches varies substantially across the categories. Moreover, the category for which a code summarization model performs the best is different for the different models. In particular, no models perform the best for “why” and “property” comments among the six categories. We design a composite approach to demonstrate that comment category prediction can boost code summarization to reach better results. The approach leverages classified code-category labeled data to train a classifier to infer categories. Then it selects the most suitable models for inferred categories and outputs the composite results. Our composite approach outperforms other approaches that do not consider comment categories and obtains a relative improvement of 8.57% and 16.34% in terms of ROUGE-L and BLEU-4 score, respectively. 2021-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6706 info:doi/10.1145/3434280 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7709/viewcontent/TOSEM_Qiuyuan_Chen_2021_Why_My_Code_Summarization_Model_Does_Not_Work.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Code summarization code comment comment classification Databases and Information Systems Software Engineering
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Code summarization
code comment
comment classification
Databases and Information Systems
Software Engineering
spellingShingle Code summarization
code comment
comment classification
Databases and Information Systems
Software Engineering
CHEN, Qiuyuan
XIA, Xin
HU, Han
LO, David
LI, Shanping
Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction
description Code summarization aims at generating a code comment given a block of source code and it is normally performed by training machine learning algorithms on existing code block-comment pairs. Code comments in practice have different intentions. For example, some code comments might explain how the methods work, while others explain why some methods are written. Previous works have shown that a relationship exists between a code block and the category of a comment associated with it. In this article, we aim to investigate to which extent we can exploit this relationship to improve code summarization performance. We first classify comments into six intention categories and manually label 20,000 code-comment pairs. These categories include “what,” “why,” “how-to-use,” “how-it-is-done,” “property,” and “others.” Based on this dataset, we conduct an experiment to investigate the performance of different state-of-the-art code summarization approaches on the categories. We find that the performance of different code summarization approaches varies substantially across the categories. Moreover, the category for which a code summarization model performs the best is different for the different models. In particular, no models perform the best for “why” and “property” comments among the six categories. We design a composite approach to demonstrate that comment category prediction can boost code summarization to reach better results. The approach leverages classified code-category labeled data to train a classifier to infer categories. Then it selects the most suitable models for inferred categories and outputs the composite results. Our composite approach outperforms other approaches that do not consider comment categories and obtains a relative improvement of 8.57% and 16.34% in terms of ROUGE-L and BLEU-4 score, respectively.
format text
author CHEN, Qiuyuan
XIA, Xin
HU, Han
LO, David
LI, Shanping
author_facet CHEN, Qiuyuan
XIA, Xin
HU, Han
LO, David
LI, Shanping
author_sort CHEN, Qiuyuan
title Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction
title_short Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction
title_full Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction
title_fullStr Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction
title_full_unstemmed Why my code summarization model does not Work: Code comment improvement with category prediction
title_sort why my code summarization model does not work: code comment improvement with category prediction
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6706
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/7709/viewcontent/TOSEM_Qiuyuan_Chen_2021_Why_My_Code_Summarization_Model_Does_Not_Work.pdf
_version_ 1770576051095732224