Automatic loop summarization via path dependency analysis
Analyzing loops is very important for various software engineering tasks such as bug detection, test case generation and program optimization. However, loops are very challenging structures for program analysis, especially when (nested) loops contain multiple paths that have complex interleaving rel...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7100 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8103/viewcontent/336ed1cc9c1df91a9ae8b5a4977cc8d93e8f.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Analyzing loops is very important for various software engineering tasks such as bug detection, test case generation and program optimization. However, loops are very challenging structures for program analysis, especially when (nested) loops contain multiple paths that have complex interleaving relationships. In this paper, we propose the path dependency automaton (PDA) to capture the dependencies among the multiple paths in a loop. Based on the PDA, we first propose a loop classification to understand the complexity of loop summarization. Then, we propose a loop analysis framework, named Proteus, which takes a loop program and a set of variables of interest as inputs and summarizes path-sensitive loop effects (i.e., disjunctive loop summary) on the variables of interest. An algorithm is proposed to traverse the PDA to summarize the effect for all possible executions in the loop. We have evaluated Proteus using loops from five open-source projects and two well-known benchmarks and applying the disjunctive loop summary to three applications: loop bound analysis, program verification and test case generation. The evaluation results have demonstrated that Proteus can compute a more precise bound than the existing loop bound analysis techniques; Proteus can significantly outperform the state-of-the-art tools for loop program verification; and Proteus can help generate test cases for deep loops within one second, while symbolic execution tools KLEE and Pex either need much more time or fail. |
---|