Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability
Multi-hop reasoning has been widely studied in recent years to obtain more interpretable link prediction. However, we find in experiments that many paths given by these models are actually unreasonable, while little work has been done on interpretability evaluation for them. In this paper, we propos...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7317 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8320/viewcontent/2021.emnlp_main.700.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-8320 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-83202022-09-29T06:00:47Z Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability LV, Xin CAO, Yixin HOU, Lei LI, Juanzi LIU, Zhiyuan ZHANG, Yichi DAI, Zelin Multi-hop reasoning has been widely studied in recent years to obtain more interpretable link prediction. However, we find in experiments that many paths given by these models are actually unreasonable, while little work has been done on interpretability evaluation for them. In this paper, we propose a unified framework to quantitatively evaluate the interpretability of multi-hop reasoning models so as to advance their development. In specific, we define three metrics, including path recall, local interpretability, and global interpretability for evaluation, and design an approximate strategy to calculate these metrics using the interpretability scores of rules. We manually annotate all possible rules and establish a benchmark. In experiments, we verify the effectiveness of our benchmark. Besides, we run nine representative baselines on our benchmark, and the experimental results show that the interpretability of current multi-hop reasoning models is less satisfactory and is 51.7% lower than the upper bound given by our benchmark. Moreover, the rule-based models outperform the multi-hop reasoning models in terms of performance and interpretability, which points to a direction for future research, i.e., how to better incorporate rule information into the multi-hop reasoning model. We will publish our codes and datasets upon acceptance. 2021-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7317 info:doi/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.700 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8320/viewcontent/2021.emnlp_main.700.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Databases and Information Systems |
spellingShingle |
Databases and Information Systems LV, Xin CAO, Yixin HOU, Lei LI, Juanzi LIU, Zhiyuan ZHANG, Yichi DAI, Zelin Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability |
description |
Multi-hop reasoning has been widely studied in recent years to obtain more interpretable link prediction. However, we find in experiments that many paths given by these models are actually unreasonable, while little work has been done on interpretability evaluation for them. In this paper, we propose a unified framework to quantitatively evaluate the interpretability of multi-hop reasoning models so as to advance their development. In specific, we define three metrics, including path recall, local interpretability, and global interpretability for evaluation, and design an approximate strategy to calculate these metrics using the interpretability scores of rules. We manually annotate all possible rules and establish a benchmark. In experiments, we verify the effectiveness of our benchmark. Besides, we run nine representative baselines on our benchmark, and the experimental results show that the interpretability of current multi-hop reasoning models is less satisfactory and is 51.7% lower than the upper bound given by our benchmark. Moreover, the rule-based models outperform the multi-hop reasoning models in terms of performance and interpretability, which points to a direction for future research, i.e., how to better incorporate rule information into the multi-hop reasoning model. We will publish our codes and datasets upon acceptance. |
format |
text |
author |
LV, Xin CAO, Yixin HOU, Lei LI, Juanzi LIU, Zhiyuan ZHANG, Yichi DAI, Zelin |
author_facet |
LV, Xin CAO, Yixin HOU, Lei LI, Juanzi LIU, Zhiyuan ZHANG, Yichi DAI, Zelin |
author_sort |
LV, Xin |
title |
Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability |
title_short |
Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability |
title_full |
Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability |
title_fullStr |
Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? Towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability |
title_sort |
is multi-hop reasoning really explainable? towards benchmarking reasoning interpretability |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7317 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8320/viewcontent/2021.emnlp_main.700.pdf |
_version_ |
1770576310346711040 |