A carbon-aware planning framework for production scheduling in mining

Managing the flow of excavated materials from a mine pit and the subsequent processing steps is the logistical challenge in mining. Mine planning needs to consider various geometric and resource constraints while maximizing the net present value (NPV) of profits over a long horizon. This mine planni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AZHAR, Nurual Asyikeen, GUNAWAN, Aldy, CHENG, Shih-Fen, LEONARDI, Erwin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7566
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8569/viewcontent/978_3_031_16579_5_30_pv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Managing the flow of excavated materials from a mine pit and the subsequent processing steps is the logistical challenge in mining. Mine planning needs to consider various geometric and resource constraints while maximizing the net present value (NPV) of profits over a long horizon. This mine planning problem has been modelled and solved as a precedence constrained production scheduling problem (PCPSP) using heuristics, due to its NP-hardness. However, the recent push for sustainable and carbon-aware mining practices calls for new planning approaches. In this paper, we propose an efficient temporally decomposed greedy Lagrangian relaxation (TDGLR) approach to maximize profits while observing the stipulated carbon emission limit per year. With a collection of real-world-inspired mining datasets, we demonstrate how we generate approximated Pareto fronts for planners. Using this approach, they can choose mine plans that maximize profits while observing the given carbon emission target. The TDGLR was compared against a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model to solve a real mine dataset with the gaps not exceeding 0.3178%0.3178% and averaging 0.015%0.015%. For larger instances, MIP cannot even generate feasible solutions.