How to find actionable static analysis warnings: A case study with FindBugs

Automatically generated static code warnings suffer from a large number of false alarms. Hence, developers only take action on a small percent of those warnings. To better predict which static code warnings should ot be ignored, we suggest that analysts need to look deeper into their algorithms to f...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: YEDIDA, Rahul, KANG, Hong Jin, TU, Huy, YANG, Xueqi, LO, David, MENZIES, Tim
التنسيق: text
اللغة:English
منشور في: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7768
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8771/viewcontent/ActionableStaticAnalysisWarn_av.pdf
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
المؤسسة: Singapore Management University
اللغة: English
الوصف
الملخص:Automatically generated static code warnings suffer from a large number of false alarms. Hence, developers only take action on a small percent of those warnings. To better predict which static code warnings should ot be ignored, we suggest that analysts need to look deeper into their algorithms to find choices that better improve the particulars of their specific problem. Specifically, we show here that effective predictors of such warnings can be created by methods that ocally adjust the decision boundary (between actionable warnings and others). These methods yield a new high water-mark for recognizing actionable static code warnings. For eight open-source Java projects (cassandra, jmeter, commons, lucene-solr, maven, ant, tomcat, derby) we achieve perfect test results on 4/8 datasets and, overall, a median AUC (area under the true negatives, true positives curve) of 92%.