Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?

Many Duplicate Bug Report Detection (DBRD) techniques have been proposed in the research literature. The industry uses some other techniques. Unfortunately, there is insufficient comparison among them, and it is unclear how far we have been. This work fills this gap by comparing the aforementioned t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHANG, Ting, HAN, DongGyun, VINAYAKARAO, Venkatesh, IRSAN, Ivana Clairine, XU, Bowen, Ferdian, Thung, LO, David, JIANG, Lingxiao
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7788
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8791/viewcontent/3576042_pvoa.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-8791
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-87912023-09-13T00:48:09Z Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we? ZHANG, Ting HAN, DongGyun VINAYAKARAO, Venkatesh IRSAN, Ivana Clairine XU, Bowen Ferdian, Thung LO, David JIANG, Lingxiao Many Duplicate Bug Report Detection (DBRD) techniques have been proposed in the research literature. The industry uses some other techniques. Unfortunately, there is insufficient comparison among them, and it is unclear how far we have been. This work fills this gap by comparing the aforementioned techniques. To compare them, we first need a benchmark that can estimate how a tool would perform if applied in a realistic setting today. Thus, we first investigated potential biases that affect the fair comparison of the accuracy of DBRD techniques. Our experiments suggest that data age and issue tracking system choice cause a significant difference. Based on these findings, we prepared a new benchmark. We then used it to evaluate DBRD techniques to estimate better how far we have been. Surprisingly, a simpler technique outperforms recently proposed sophisticated techniques on most projects in our benchmark. In addition, we compared the DBRD techniques proposed in research with those used in Mozilla and VSCode. Surprisingly, we observe that a simple technique already adopted in practice can achieve comparable results as a recently proposed research tool. Our study gives reflections on the current state of DBRD, and we share our insights to benefit future DBRD research. 2023-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7788 info:doi/10.1145/3576042 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8791/viewcontent/3576042_pvoa.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Bug Reports Duplicate Bug Report Detection Deep Learning Empirical Study Software Engineering
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Bug Reports
Duplicate Bug Report Detection
Deep Learning
Empirical Study
Software Engineering
spellingShingle Bug Reports
Duplicate Bug Report Detection
Deep Learning
Empirical Study
Software Engineering
ZHANG, Ting
HAN, DongGyun
VINAYAKARAO, Venkatesh
IRSAN, Ivana Clairine
XU, Bowen
Ferdian, Thung
LO, David
JIANG, Lingxiao
Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?
description Many Duplicate Bug Report Detection (DBRD) techniques have been proposed in the research literature. The industry uses some other techniques. Unfortunately, there is insufficient comparison among them, and it is unclear how far we have been. This work fills this gap by comparing the aforementioned techniques. To compare them, we first need a benchmark that can estimate how a tool would perform if applied in a realistic setting today. Thus, we first investigated potential biases that affect the fair comparison of the accuracy of DBRD techniques. Our experiments suggest that data age and issue tracking system choice cause a significant difference. Based on these findings, we prepared a new benchmark. We then used it to evaluate DBRD techniques to estimate better how far we have been. Surprisingly, a simpler technique outperforms recently proposed sophisticated techniques on most projects in our benchmark. In addition, we compared the DBRD techniques proposed in research with those used in Mozilla and VSCode. Surprisingly, we observe that a simple technique already adopted in practice can achieve comparable results as a recently proposed research tool. Our study gives reflections on the current state of DBRD, and we share our insights to benefit future DBRD research.
format text
author ZHANG, Ting
HAN, DongGyun
VINAYAKARAO, Venkatesh
IRSAN, Ivana Clairine
XU, Bowen
Ferdian, Thung
LO, David
JIANG, Lingxiao
author_facet ZHANG, Ting
HAN, DongGyun
VINAYAKARAO, Venkatesh
IRSAN, Ivana Clairine
XU, Bowen
Ferdian, Thung
LO, David
JIANG, Lingxiao
author_sort ZHANG, Ting
title Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?
title_short Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?
title_full Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?
title_fullStr Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?
title_full_unstemmed Duplicate bug report detection: How far are we?
title_sort duplicate bug report detection: how far are we?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7788
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8791/viewcontent/3576042_pvoa.pdf
_version_ 1779157131033837568