Data provenance via differential auditing
With the rising awareness of data assets, data governance, which is to understand where data comes from, how it is collected, and how it is used, has been assuming evergrowing importance. One critical component of data governance gaining increasing attention is auditing machine learning models to de...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7808 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8811/viewcontent/2209.01538.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-8811 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-88112023-12-12T05:35:37Z Data provenance via differential auditing MU, Xin PANG, Ming ZHU, Feida With the rising awareness of data assets, data governance, which is to understand where data comes from, how it is collected, and how it is used, has been assuming evergrowing importance. One critical component of data governance gaining increasing attention is auditing machine learning models to determine if specific data has been used for training. Existing auditing techniques, like shadow auditing methods, have shown feasibility under specific conditions such as having access to label information and knowledge of training protocols. However, these conditions are often not met in most real-world applications. In this paper, we introduce a practical framework for auditing data provenance based on a differential mechanism, i.e., after carefully designed transformation, perturbed input data from the target model's training set would result in much more drastic changes in the output than those from the model's non-training set. Our framework is data-dependent and does not require distinguishing training data from non-training data or training additional shadow models with labeled output data. Furthermore, our framework extends beyond point-based data auditing to group-based data auditing, aligning with the needs of real-world applications. Our theoretical analysis of the differential mechanism and the experimental results on real-world data sets verify the proposal's effectiveness. The codes have been uploaded in an anonymous link. 2023-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7808 info:doi/10.1109/TKDE.2023.3334821 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8811/viewcontent/2209.01538.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Data models training data biological system modeling computational modeling predictive models machine learning Databases and Information Systems Data Storage Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Data models training data biological system modeling computational modeling predictive models machine learning Databases and Information Systems Data Storage Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing |
spellingShingle |
Data models training data biological system modeling computational modeling predictive models machine learning Databases and Information Systems Data Storage Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing MU, Xin PANG, Ming ZHU, Feida Data provenance via differential auditing |
description |
With the rising awareness of data assets, data governance, which is to understand where data comes from, how it is collected, and how it is used, has been assuming evergrowing importance. One critical component of data governance gaining increasing attention is auditing machine learning models to determine if specific data has been used for training. Existing auditing techniques, like shadow auditing methods, have shown feasibility under specific conditions such as having access to label information and knowledge of training protocols. However, these conditions are often not met in most real-world applications. In this paper, we introduce a practical framework for auditing data provenance based on a differential mechanism, i.e., after carefully designed transformation, perturbed input data from the target model's training set would result in much more drastic changes in the output than those from the model's non-training set. Our framework is data-dependent and does not require distinguishing training data from non-training data or training additional shadow models with labeled output data. Furthermore, our framework extends beyond point-based data auditing to group-based data auditing, aligning with the needs of real-world applications. Our theoretical analysis of the differential mechanism and the experimental results on real-world data sets verify the proposal's effectiveness. The codes have been uploaded in an anonymous link. |
format |
text |
author |
MU, Xin PANG, Ming ZHU, Feida |
author_facet |
MU, Xin PANG, Ming ZHU, Feida |
author_sort |
MU, Xin |
title |
Data provenance via differential auditing |
title_short |
Data provenance via differential auditing |
title_full |
Data provenance via differential auditing |
title_fullStr |
Data provenance via differential auditing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Data provenance via differential auditing |
title_sort |
data provenance via differential auditing |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/7808 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/8811/viewcontent/2209.01538.pdf |
_version_ |
1787136835057614848 |