Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection

Abstract Graph anomaly detection has attracted a lot of interest recently. Despite their successes, existing detectors have at least two of the three weaknesses: (a) high computational cost which limits them to small-scale networks only; (b) existing treatment of subgraphs produces suboptimal detect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHUANG, Zhong, TING, Kai Ming, PANG, Guansong, SONG, Shuaibin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8006
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9009/viewcontent/1.9781611977653.ch79.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-9009
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-90092023-08-15T01:56:48Z Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection ZHUANG, Zhong TING, Kai Ming PANG, Guansong SONG, Shuaibin Abstract Graph anomaly detection has attracted a lot of interest recently. Despite their successes, existing detectors have at least two of the three weaknesses: (a) high computational cost which limits them to small-scale networks only; (b) existing treatment of subgraphs produces suboptimal detection accuracy; and (c) unable to provide an explanation as to why a node is anomalous, once it is identified. We identify that the root cause of these weaknesses is a lack of a proper treatment for subgraphs. A treatment called Subgraph Centralization for graph anomaly detection is proposed to address all the above weaknesses. Its importance is shown in two ways. First, we present a simple yet effective new framework called Graph-Centric Anomaly Detection (GCAD). The key advantages of GCAD over existing detectors including deep-learning detectors are: (i) better anomaly detection accuracy; (ii) linear time complexity with respect to the number of nodes; and (iii) it is a generic framework that admits an existing point anomaly detector to be used to detect node anomalies in a network. Second, we show that Subgraph Centralization can be incorporated into two existing detectors to overcome the above-mentioned weaknesses. 2023-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8006 info:doi/10.1137/1.9781611977653.ch79 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9009/viewcontent/1.9781611977653.ch79.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems Graphics and Human Computer Interfaces
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Databases and Information Systems
Graphics and Human Computer Interfaces
spellingShingle Databases and Information Systems
Graphics and Human Computer Interfaces
ZHUANG, Zhong
TING, Kai Ming
PANG, Guansong
SONG, Shuaibin
Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection
description Abstract Graph anomaly detection has attracted a lot of interest recently. Despite their successes, existing detectors have at least two of the three weaknesses: (a) high computational cost which limits them to small-scale networks only; (b) existing treatment of subgraphs produces suboptimal detection accuracy; and (c) unable to provide an explanation as to why a node is anomalous, once it is identified. We identify that the root cause of these weaknesses is a lack of a proper treatment for subgraphs. A treatment called Subgraph Centralization for graph anomaly detection is proposed to address all the above weaknesses. Its importance is shown in two ways. First, we present a simple yet effective new framework called Graph-Centric Anomaly Detection (GCAD). The key advantages of GCAD over existing detectors including deep-learning detectors are: (i) better anomaly detection accuracy; (ii) linear time complexity with respect to the number of nodes; and (iii) it is a generic framework that admits an existing point anomaly detector to be used to detect node anomalies in a network. Second, we show that Subgraph Centralization can be incorporated into two existing detectors to overcome the above-mentioned weaknesses.
format text
author ZHUANG, Zhong
TING, Kai Ming
PANG, Guansong
SONG, Shuaibin
author_facet ZHUANG, Zhong
TING, Kai Ming
PANG, Guansong
SONG, Shuaibin
author_sort ZHUANG, Zhong
title Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection
title_short Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection
title_full Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection
title_fullStr Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection
title_full_unstemmed Subgraph centralization: A necessary step for graph anomaly detection
title_sort subgraph centralization: a necessary step for graph anomaly detection
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8006
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9009/viewcontent/1.9781611977653.ch79.pdf
_version_ 1779156933816614912