Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in various applications, but they still face various inconsistency issues. Existing works primarily focus on the inconsistency issues within a single LLM, while we complementarily explore the inter-consistency among multiple LLMs for co...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8391 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9394/viewcontent/2305.11595.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-9394 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-93942024-01-09T03:55:59Z Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate XIONG, Kai DING, Xiao CAO, Yixin LIU, Ting QIN, Bing Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in various applications, but they still face various inconsistency issues. Existing works primarily focus on the inconsistency issues within a single LLM, while we complementarily explore the inter-consistency among multiple LLMs for collaboration. To examine whether LLMs can collaborate effectively to achieve a consensus for a shared goal, we focus on commonsense reasoning, and introduce a formal debate framework (FORD) to conduct a three-stage debate among LLMs with real-world scenarios alignment: fair debate, mismatched debate, and roundtable debate. Through extensive experiments on various datasets, LLMs can effectively collaborate to reach a consensus despite noticeable inter-inconsistencies, but imbalances in their abilities can lead to domination by superior LLMs. Leveraging a more advanced LLM like GPT-4 as an authoritative judge can boost collaboration performance. Our work contributes to understanding the inter-consistency among LLMs and lays the foundation for developing future collaboration methods. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/WasteWood/FORD. 2023-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8391 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9394/viewcontent/2305.11595.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems Programming Languages and Compilers |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Databases and Information Systems Programming Languages and Compilers |
spellingShingle |
Databases and Information Systems Programming Languages and Compilers XIONG, Kai DING, Xiao CAO, Yixin LIU, Ting QIN, Bing Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate |
description |
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in various applications, but they still face various inconsistency issues. Existing works primarily focus on the inconsistency issues within a single LLM, while we complementarily explore the inter-consistency among multiple LLMs for collaboration. To examine whether LLMs can collaborate effectively to achieve a consensus for a shared goal, we focus on commonsense reasoning, and introduce a formal debate framework (FORD) to conduct a three-stage debate among LLMs with real-world scenarios alignment: fair debate, mismatched debate, and roundtable debate. Through extensive experiments on various datasets, LLMs can effectively collaborate to reach a consensus despite noticeable inter-inconsistencies, but imbalances in their abilities can lead to domination by superior LLMs. Leveraging a more advanced LLM like GPT-4 as an authoritative judge can boost collaboration performance. Our work contributes to understanding the inter-consistency among LLMs and lays the foundation for developing future collaboration methods. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/WasteWood/FORD. |
format |
text |
author |
XIONG, Kai DING, Xiao CAO, Yixin LIU, Ting QIN, Bing |
author_facet |
XIONG, Kai DING, Xiao CAO, Yixin LIU, Ting QIN, Bing |
author_sort |
XIONG, Kai |
title |
Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate |
title_short |
Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate |
title_full |
Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate |
title_fullStr |
Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Examining the Inter-consistency of large language models: An in-depth analysis via debate |
title_sort |
examining the inter-consistency of large language models: an in-depth analysis via debate |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8391 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9394/viewcontent/2305.11595.pdf |
_version_ |
1787590767633498112 |