Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?

Stack Overflow, the world's largest software Q&A (SQA) website, is facing a significant traffic drop due to the emergence of generative AI techniques. ChatGPT is banned by Stack Overflow after only 6 days from its release. The main reason provided by the official Stack Overflow is that the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: XU, Bowen, NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat, LE-CONG, Thanh, HOANG, Thong, LIU, Jiakun, KIM, Kisub, GONG, Chen, NIU, Changan, WANG, Chenyu, David LO, LO, David
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8489
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9492/viewcontent/EmbraceGAI_Software_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-9492
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-94922024-01-04T09:01:08Z Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? XU, Bowen NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat LE-CONG, Thanh HOANG, Thong LIU, Jiakun KIM, Kisub GONG, Chen NIU, Changan WANG, Chenyu David LO, LO, David Stack Overflow, the world's largest software Q&A (SQA) website, is facing a significant traffic drop due to the emergence of generative AI techniques. ChatGPT is banned by Stack Overflow after only 6 days from its release. The main reason provided by the official Stack Overflow is that the answers generated by ChatGPT are of low quality. To verify this, we conduct a comparative evaluation of human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers. Our methodology employs both automatic comparison and a manual study. Our results suggest that human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers are semantically similar, however, human-written answers outperform ChatGPT-generated ones consistently across multiple aspects, specifically by 10% on the overall score. We release the data, analysis scripts, and detailed results at https://github.com/maxxbw54/GAI4SQA. 2023-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8489 info:doi/10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00023 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9492/viewcontent/EmbraceGAI_Software_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University ChatGPT Generative AI large language model Software Q&A Stack Overflow Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Software Engineering
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic ChatGPT
Generative AI
large language model
Software Q&A
Stack Overflow
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Software Engineering
spellingShingle ChatGPT
Generative AI
large language model
Software Q&A
Stack Overflow
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Software Engineering
XU, Bowen
NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat
LE-CONG, Thanh
HOANG, Thong
LIU, Jiakun
KIM, Kisub
GONG, Chen
NIU, Changan
WANG, Chenyu
David LO,
LO, David
Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?
description Stack Overflow, the world's largest software Q&A (SQA) website, is facing a significant traffic drop due to the emergence of generative AI techniques. ChatGPT is banned by Stack Overflow after only 6 days from its release. The main reason provided by the official Stack Overflow is that the answers generated by ChatGPT are of low quality. To verify this, we conduct a comparative evaluation of human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers. Our methodology employs both automatic comparison and a manual study. Our results suggest that human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers are semantically similar, however, human-written answers outperform ChatGPT-generated ones consistently across multiple aspects, specifically by 10% on the overall score. We release the data, analysis scripts, and detailed results at https://github.com/maxxbw54/GAI4SQA.
format text
author XU, Bowen
NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat
LE-CONG, Thanh
HOANG, Thong
LIU, Jiakun
KIM, Kisub
GONG, Chen
NIU, Changan
WANG, Chenyu
David LO,
LO, David
author_facet XU, Bowen
NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat
LE-CONG, Thanh
HOANG, Thong
LIU, Jiakun
KIM, Kisub
GONG, Chen
NIU, Changan
WANG, Chenyu
David LO,
LO, David
author_sort XU, Bowen
title Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?
title_short Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?
title_full Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?
title_fullStr Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?
title_full_unstemmed Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?
title_sort are we ready to embrace generative ai for software q&a?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8489
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9492/viewcontent/EmbraceGAI_Software_av.pdf
_version_ 1787590779058782208