Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A?
Stack Overflow, the world's largest software Q&A (SQA) website, is facing a significant traffic drop due to the emergence of generative AI techniques. ChatGPT is banned by Stack Overflow after only 6 days from its release. The main reason provided by the official Stack Overflow is that the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8489 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9492/viewcontent/EmbraceGAI_Software_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-9492 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-94922024-01-04T09:01:08Z Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? XU, Bowen NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat LE-CONG, Thanh HOANG, Thong LIU, Jiakun KIM, Kisub GONG, Chen NIU, Changan WANG, Chenyu David LO, LO, David Stack Overflow, the world's largest software Q&A (SQA) website, is facing a significant traffic drop due to the emergence of generative AI techniques. ChatGPT is banned by Stack Overflow after only 6 days from its release. The main reason provided by the official Stack Overflow is that the answers generated by ChatGPT are of low quality. To verify this, we conduct a comparative evaluation of human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers. Our methodology employs both automatic comparison and a manual study. Our results suggest that human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers are semantically similar, however, human-written answers outperform ChatGPT-generated ones consistently across multiple aspects, specifically by 10% on the overall score. We release the data, analysis scripts, and detailed results at https://github.com/maxxbw54/GAI4SQA. 2023-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8489 info:doi/10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00023 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9492/viewcontent/EmbraceGAI_Software_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University ChatGPT Generative AI large language model Software Q&A Stack Overflow Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Software Engineering |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
ChatGPT Generative AI large language model Software Q&A Stack Overflow Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Software Engineering |
spellingShingle |
ChatGPT Generative AI large language model Software Q&A Stack Overflow Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Software Engineering XU, Bowen NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat LE-CONG, Thanh HOANG, Thong LIU, Jiakun KIM, Kisub GONG, Chen NIU, Changan WANG, Chenyu David LO, LO, David Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? |
description |
Stack Overflow, the world's largest software Q&A (SQA) website, is facing a significant traffic drop due to the emergence of generative AI techniques. ChatGPT is banned by Stack Overflow after only 6 days from its release. The main reason provided by the official Stack Overflow is that the answers generated by ChatGPT are of low quality. To verify this, we conduct a comparative evaluation of human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers. Our methodology employs both automatic comparison and a manual study. Our results suggest that human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers are semantically similar, however, human-written answers outperform ChatGPT-generated ones consistently across multiple aspects, specifically by 10% on the overall score. We release the data, analysis scripts, and detailed results at https://github.com/maxxbw54/GAI4SQA. |
format |
text |
author |
XU, Bowen NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat LE-CONG, Thanh HOANG, Thong LIU, Jiakun KIM, Kisub GONG, Chen NIU, Changan WANG, Chenyu David LO, LO, David |
author_facet |
XU, Bowen NGUYEN, Thanh-Dat LE-CONG, Thanh HOANG, Thong LIU, Jiakun KIM, Kisub GONG, Chen NIU, Changan WANG, Chenyu David LO, LO, David |
author_sort |
XU, Bowen |
title |
Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? |
title_short |
Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? |
title_full |
Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? |
title_fullStr |
Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are we ready to embrace generative AI for software Q&A? |
title_sort |
are we ready to embrace generative ai for software q&a? |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8489 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9492/viewcontent/EmbraceGAI_Software_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1787590779058782208 |