Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration
Conversational systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, show exceptional proficiency in context understanding and response generation. However, they still possess limitations, such as failing to ask clarifying questions to ambiguous queries or refuse users’ unreasonable reques...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8583 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9586/viewcontent/2023.findings_emnlp.711.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-9586 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-95862024-01-25T08:54:18Z Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration DENG, Yang LIAO, Lizi CHEN, Liang WANG, Hongru LEI, Wenqiang CHUA, Tat-Seng Conversational systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, show exceptional proficiency in context understanding and response generation. However, they still possess limitations, such as failing to ask clarifying questions to ambiguous queries or refuse users’ unreasonable requests, both of which are considered as key aspects of a conversational agent’s proactivity. This raises the question of whether LLM-based conversational systems are equipped to handle proactive dialogue problems. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of LLM-based conversational systems, specifically focusing on three key aspects of proactive dialogues: clarification, target-guided, and non-collaborative dialogues. To trigger the proactivity of LLMs, we propose the Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme, which augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains. Empirical findings are discussed to promote future studies on LLM-based proactive dialogue systems. 2023-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8583 info:doi/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.711 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9586/viewcontent/2023.findings_emnlp.711.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University large language model conversational system Artificial Intelligence and Robotics |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
large language model conversational system Artificial Intelligence and Robotics |
spellingShingle |
large language model conversational system Artificial Intelligence and Robotics DENG, Yang LIAO, Lizi CHEN, Liang WANG, Hongru LEI, Wenqiang CHUA, Tat-Seng Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration |
description |
Conversational systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, show exceptional proficiency in context understanding and response generation. However, they still possess limitations, such as failing to ask clarifying questions to ambiguous queries or refuse users’ unreasonable requests, both of which are considered as key aspects of a conversational agent’s proactivity. This raises the question of whether LLM-based conversational systems are equipped to handle proactive dialogue problems. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of LLM-based conversational systems, specifically focusing on three key aspects of proactive dialogues: clarification, target-guided, and non-collaborative dialogues. To trigger the proactivity of LLMs, we propose the Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme, which augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains. Empirical findings are discussed to promote future studies on LLM-based proactive dialogue systems. |
format |
text |
author |
DENG, Yang LIAO, Lizi CHEN, Liang WANG, Hongru LEI, Wenqiang CHUA, Tat-Seng |
author_facet |
DENG, Yang LIAO, Lizi CHEN, Liang WANG, Hongru LEI, Wenqiang CHUA, Tat-Seng |
author_sort |
DENG, Yang |
title |
Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration |
title_short |
Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration |
title_full |
Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration |
title_fullStr |
Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: Clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration |
title_sort |
prompting and evaluating large language models for proactive dialogues: clarification, target-guided, and non-collaboration |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8583 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9586/viewcontent/2023.findings_emnlp.711.pdf |
_version_ |
1789483280379150336 |