Active code learning: Benchmarking sample-efficient training of code models

• Main Authors: HU, Qiang, GUO, Yuejun, XIE, Xiaofei, CORDY, Maxime, MA, Lei, PAPADAKIS, Mike, TRAON, Yves Le
• Format: text
• Language: English
• Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
• Subjects: Codes; Data Models; Task Analysis; Training; Feature Extraction; Training Data; Labeling; Active Learning; Machine Learning For Code; Benchmark; Empirical Analysis; Software Engineering
• Online Access: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8695; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9698/viewcontent/ActiveCodeLearning_av.pdf
• Institution: Singapore Management University

The costly human effort required to prepare the training data of machine learning (ML) models hinders their practical development and usage in software engineering (ML4Code), especially for those with limited budgets. Therefore, efficiently training models of code with less human effort has become an emergent problem. Active learning is such a technique to address this issue that allows developers to train a model with reduced data while producing models with desired performance, which has been well studied in computer vision and natural language processing domains. Unfortunately, there is no such work that explores the effectiveness of active learning for code models. In this paper, we bridge this gap by building the first benchmark to study this critical problem - active code learning. Specifically, we collect 11 acquisition functions (which are used for data selection in active learning) from existing works and adapt them for code-related tasks. Then, we conduct an empirical study to check whether these acquisition functions maintain performance for code data. The results demonstrate that feature selection highly affects active learning and using output vectors to select data is the best choice. For the code summarization task, active code learning is ineffective which produces models with over a 29.64% gap compared to the expected performance. Furthermore, we explore future directions of active code learning with an exploratory study. We propose to replace distance calculation methods with evaluation metrics and find a correlation between these evaluation-based distance methods and the performance of code models.