GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption
Discussions is a new feature of GitHub for asking questions or discussing topics outside of specific Issues or Pull Requests. Before being available to all projects in December 2020, it had been tested on selected open source software projects. To understand how developers use this novel feature, ho...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8788 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9791/viewcontent/discussions.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-9791 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-97912024-05-30T08:52:48Z GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption HATA, Hideaki NOVIELLI, Nicole BALTES, Sebastian KULA, Raula TREUDE, Christoph Discussions is a new feature of GitHub for asking questions or discussing topics outside of specific Issues or Pull Requests. Before being available to all projects in December 2020, it had been tested on selected open source software projects. To understand how developers use this novel feature, how they perceive it, and how it impacts the development processes, we conducted a mixed-methods study based on early adopters of GitHub discussions from January until July 2020. We found that: (1) errors, unexpected behavior, and code reviews are prevalent discussion categories; (2) there is a positive relationship between project member involvement and discussion frequency; (3) developers consider GitHub Discussions useful but face the problem of topic duplication between Discussions and Issues; (4) Discussions play a crucial role in advancing the development of projects; and (5) positive sentiment in Discussions is more frequent than in Stack Overflow posts. Our findings are a first step towards data-informed guidance for using GitHub Discussions, opening up avenues for future work on this novel communication channel. 2022-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8788 info:doi/10.1007/s10664-021-10058-6 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9791/viewcontent/discussions.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University GitHub Discussions communications sentiment empirical study exploratory study Software Engineering |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
GitHub Discussions communications sentiment empirical study exploratory study Software Engineering |
spellingShingle |
GitHub Discussions communications sentiment empirical study exploratory study Software Engineering HATA, Hideaki NOVIELLI, Nicole BALTES, Sebastian KULA, Raula TREUDE, Christoph GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption |
description |
Discussions is a new feature of GitHub for asking questions or discussing topics outside of specific Issues or Pull Requests. Before being available to all projects in December 2020, it had been tested on selected open source software projects. To understand how developers use this novel feature, how they perceive it, and how it impacts the development processes, we conducted a mixed-methods study based on early adopters of GitHub discussions from January until July 2020. We found that: (1) errors, unexpected behavior, and code reviews are prevalent discussion categories; (2) there is a positive relationship between project member involvement and discussion frequency; (3) developers consider GitHub Discussions useful but face the problem of topic duplication between Discussions and Issues; (4) Discussions play a crucial role in advancing the development of projects; and (5) positive sentiment in Discussions is more frequent than in Stack Overflow posts. Our findings are a first step towards data-informed guidance for using GitHub Discussions, opening up avenues for future work on this novel communication channel. |
format |
text |
author |
HATA, Hideaki NOVIELLI, Nicole BALTES, Sebastian KULA, Raula TREUDE, Christoph |
author_facet |
HATA, Hideaki NOVIELLI, Nicole BALTES, Sebastian KULA, Raula TREUDE, Christoph |
author_sort |
HATA, Hideaki |
title |
GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption |
title_short |
GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption |
title_full |
GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption |
title_fullStr |
GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption |
title_full_unstemmed |
GitHub Discussions: An exploratory study of early adoption |
title_sort |
github discussions: an exploratory study of early adoption |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8788 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/9791/viewcontent/discussions.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047530353164288 |