Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies
There is almost no empirical evidence on the extent to whichcopyright law works in the sense of increasing the production of creative work.Here, we study the impact of two major changes in copyright law – the extensionof copyright term and the European Rental Directive – on the production ofmovies....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research_smu/54 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=sis_research_smu |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research_smu-1053 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research_smu-10532018-07-09T06:03:21Z Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies PNG, Ivan Paak Liang QIU-HONG WANG, There is almost no empirical evidence on the extent to whichcopyright law works in the sense of increasing the production of creative work.Here, we study the impact of two major changes in copyright law – the extensionof copyright term and the European Rental Directive – on the production ofmovies. In a panel of 23 OECD countries, among which 19 extendedcopyright term at various times between 1991–2005, we found no statisticallyrobust evidence that copyright term extension was associated with higher movie production.In a panel of 17 European countries between 1991–2005, wefound no statistically robust evidence that compliance with the RentalDirective was associated with higher movie production. The extension of copyright term and European RentalDirective were particularly pertinent to the movie industry. Movies areparticularly long-lived, the Rental Directive specifically addressed the movieindustry, and, unlike other copyrightable products, sequential innovation isnot important in movies. Hence, if major changes in copyright law had nodiscernable impact on movie production, it seems the case for copyright law isweak indeed. 2016-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research_smu/54 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=sis_research_smu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Information Systems (SMU Access Only) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Copyright term extension European Rental Directive Movie production OECD countries Intellectual Property Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Copyright term extension European Rental Directive Movie production OECD countries Intellectual Property Law |
spellingShingle |
Copyright term extension European Rental Directive Movie production OECD countries Intellectual Property Law PNG, Ivan Paak Liang QIU-HONG WANG, Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies |
description |
There is almost no empirical evidence on the extent to whichcopyright law works in the sense of increasing the production of creative work.Here, we study the impact of two major changes in copyright law – the extensionof copyright term and the European Rental Directive – on the production ofmovies. In a panel of 23 OECD countries, among which 19 extendedcopyright term at various times between 1991–2005, we found no statisticallyrobust evidence that copyright term extension was associated with higher movie production.In a panel of 17 European countries between 1991–2005, wefound no statistically robust evidence that compliance with the RentalDirective was associated with higher movie production. The extension of copyright term and European RentalDirective were particularly pertinent to the movie industry. Movies areparticularly long-lived, the Rental Directive specifically addressed the movieindustry, and, unlike other copyrightable products, sequential innovation isnot important in movies. Hence, if major changes in copyright law had nodiscernable impact on movie production, it seems the case for copyright law isweak indeed. |
format |
text |
author |
PNG, Ivan Paak Liang QIU-HONG WANG, |
author_facet |
PNG, Ivan Paak Liang QIU-HONG WANG, |
author_sort |
PNG, Ivan Paak Liang |
title |
Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies |
title_short |
Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies |
title_full |
Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies |
title_fullStr |
Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies |
title_sort |
copyright law and the supply of creative work: evidence from the movies |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research_smu/54 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=sis_research_smu |
_version_ |
1712300667202174976 |