The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor
In Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor [2020] SGCA 11, the Court of Appeal (“CA”) clarified the law regarding “impossible attempts”, which are attempts to commit an offence that could not possibly have been consummated in the circumstances. The accused Han Fang Guan (“Han”) was charged with the capita...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sljlexicon/4 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sljlexicon/article/1005/viewcontent/impossibility.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sljlexicon-1005 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sljlexicon-10052023-09-18T07:38:33Z The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor LEE, Kwang Chian In Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor [2020] SGCA 11, the Court of Appeal (“CA”) clarified the law regarding “impossible attempts”, which are attempts to commit an offence that could not possibly have been consummated in the circumstances. The accused Han Fang Guan (“Han”) was charged with the capital charge of attempting to possess one bundle containing not less than 18.62g of diamorphine (also known as heroin) for the purpose of drug trafficking, an offence under section 5(1)(a) read with section 5(2) and section 12 of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) (“MDA”). 2021-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sljlexicon/4 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sljlexicon/article/1005/viewcontent/impossibility.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Singapore Law Journal (Lexicon) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Courts Food and Drug Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Asian Studies Courts Food and Drug Law |
spellingShingle |
Asian Studies Courts Food and Drug Law LEE, Kwang Chian The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor |
description |
In Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor [2020] SGCA 11, the Court of Appeal (“CA”) clarified the law regarding “impossible attempts”, which are attempts to commit an offence that could not possibly have been consummated in the circumstances. The accused Han Fang Guan (“Han”) was charged with the capital charge of attempting to possess one bundle containing not less than 18.62g of diamorphine (also known as heroin) for the purpose of drug trafficking, an offence under section 5(1)(a) read with section 5(2) and section 12 of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) (“MDA”). |
format |
text |
author |
LEE, Kwang Chian |
author_facet |
LEE, Kwang Chian |
author_sort |
LEE, Kwang Chian |
title |
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor |
title_short |
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor |
title_full |
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor |
title_fullStr |
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor |
title_sort |
impossibility defence: supreme court case summary: han fang guan v public prosecutor |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sljlexicon/4 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sljlexicon/article/1005/viewcontent/impossibility.pdf |
_version_ |
1779157194034380800 |