Stephen’s prudent person and the standard of proof in Indian Evidence Act Jurisdictions
Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872 remains on the statute books of many Commonwealth jurisdictions. The contents of the statute have also remained largely intact. Unsurprisingly, then, there has been a growing chasm between what the statute provides for and how the common law...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sljlexicon/26 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sljlexicon/article/1025/viewcontent/stephen2.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The Future of the Similar Fact Rule in an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction: Singapore
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013) -
Jurisdiction, Power, Inherent Jurisdiction, and Inherent Power
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013) -
Redefining Relevancy and Exclusionary Discretion in Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872: The Singapore Experiment and Lessons for Other Indian Evidence Act Jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2014) -
Overview of matrimonial finance in other jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2017) -
The “Party Scope” of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses
by: CHONG, Adeline
Published: (2011)