An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore

Capital punishment remains in use in Singapore. The Singapore government’s position is that the death penalty works in deterring the most serious crimes. Public trust and confidence remains healthy that the death penalty regime in Singapore has the requisite deterrent effect on criminals and has suf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TAN, Eugene K. B.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sljlexicon/40
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sljlexicon/article/1034/viewcontent/An_Abiding_Commitment.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sljlexicon-1034
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sljlexicon-10342024-08-05T00:47:24Z An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore TAN, Eugene K. B. Capital punishment remains in use in Singapore. The Singapore government’s position is that the death penalty works in deterring the most serious crimes. Public trust and confidence remains healthy that the death penalty regime in Singapore has the requisite deterrent effect on criminals and has sufficient safeguards to prevent any miscarriage of justice. In 2012, the Singapore Parliament made significant amendments to the Penal Code and the Misuse of Drugs Act, marking a shift from the longstanding mandatory to a discretionary death penalty system for some of the most serious crimes. It demonstrates the authorities’ belief that the mandatory death penalty is not needed for all types of serious crimes. This shift away from the mandatory death penalty is to be welcomed because it demonstrates that there is no abiding commitment to the death penalty. The attraction and force of the mandatory death penalty was its unequivocal demonstration of zero tolerance and resolve in maximum deterrence. This article examines the applicable laws, policies, and jurisprudence on the death penalty regime in Singapore. Singapore’s administration of capital punishment underscores that the adherence to the letter and spirit of the law that applies to persons facing capital charges must be a central tenet in the administration of criminal justice. The constant challenge is to calibrate the appropriate balance of rights and responsibilities between those who commit serious crimes, the victims and their families, and the rest of society. 2024-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sljlexicon/40 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sljlexicon/article/1034/viewcontent/An_Abiding_Commitment.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Singapore Law Journal (Lexicon) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Criminal Procedure
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Asian Studies
Criminal Procedure
spellingShingle Asian Studies
Criminal Procedure
TAN, Eugene K. B.
An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore
description Capital punishment remains in use in Singapore. The Singapore government’s position is that the death penalty works in deterring the most serious crimes. Public trust and confidence remains healthy that the death penalty regime in Singapore has the requisite deterrent effect on criminals and has sufficient safeguards to prevent any miscarriage of justice. In 2012, the Singapore Parliament made significant amendments to the Penal Code and the Misuse of Drugs Act, marking a shift from the longstanding mandatory to a discretionary death penalty system for some of the most serious crimes. It demonstrates the authorities’ belief that the mandatory death penalty is not needed for all types of serious crimes. This shift away from the mandatory death penalty is to be welcomed because it demonstrates that there is no abiding commitment to the death penalty. The attraction and force of the mandatory death penalty was its unequivocal demonstration of zero tolerance and resolve in maximum deterrence. This article examines the applicable laws, policies, and jurisprudence on the death penalty regime in Singapore. Singapore’s administration of capital punishment underscores that the adherence to the letter and spirit of the law that applies to persons facing capital charges must be a central tenet in the administration of criminal justice. The constant challenge is to calibrate the appropriate balance of rights and responsibilities between those who commit serious crimes, the victims and their families, and the rest of society.
format text
author TAN, Eugene K. B.
author_facet TAN, Eugene K. B.
author_sort TAN, Eugene K. B.
title An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore
title_short An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore
title_full An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore
title_fullStr An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed An abiding commitment to the death penalty? Centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in Singapore
title_sort abiding commitment to the death penalty? centrality of the rule of law in the administration of capital punishment in singapore
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2024
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sljlexicon/40
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sljlexicon/article/1034/viewcontent/An_Abiding_Commitment.pdf
_version_ 1814047762599116800