Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies
This thesis extends the literature on the role of state ownership by distinguishing the governance roles of two types of state-share holders in China’s listed companies. Government agencies that act as state-share holders (“GA shareholders”) are detrimental to firm value according to both the politi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2003
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/295 http://lbxml.ust.hk/th_imgo/b796733.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-1294 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-12942010-09-22T09:36:03Z Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies WANG, Jiwei This thesis extends the literature on the role of state ownership by distinguishing the governance roles of two types of state-share holders in China’s listed companies. Government agencies that act as state-share holders (“GA shareholders”) are detrimental to firm value according to both the political and managerial perspectives. Non-government agencies such as SOEs and other forms of market-oriented economic entities acting as state-share holders (“corporate state-share holders”) may not be detrimental to firm value because their goals are different from those of GA shareholders. The empirical findings are consistent with the predictions. Firms with GA shareholders perform significantly worse than other types of firms. Additionally, top management turnover is less sensitive to poor firm performance in firms with GA shareholders than in other types of firms. In contrast, there is no significant difference in performance between firms with corporate state-share holders and firms without state-owned shares. Moreover, the top management turnover in firms with corporate state-share holders is not more sensitive to poor firm performance than it is in firms without state-owned shares. The results suggest that it is the incentive of state-share holders, rather than state ownership per se, that is crucial in corporate governance for transitional economies. 2003-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/295 http://lbxml.ust.hk/th_imgo/b796733.pdf Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Accounting Asian Studies Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Accounting Asian Studies Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics |
spellingShingle |
Accounting Asian Studies Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics WANG, Jiwei Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies |
description |
This thesis extends the literature on the role of state ownership by distinguishing the governance roles of two types of state-share holders in China’s listed companies. Government agencies that act as state-share holders (“GA shareholders”) are detrimental to firm value according to both the political and managerial perspectives. Non-government agencies such as SOEs and other forms of market-oriented economic entities acting as state-share holders (“corporate state-share holders”) may not be detrimental to firm value because their goals are different from those of GA shareholders. The empirical findings are consistent with the predictions. Firms with GA shareholders perform significantly worse than other types of firms. Additionally, top management turnover is less sensitive to poor firm performance in firms with GA shareholders than in other types of firms. In contrast, there is no significant difference in performance between firms with corporate state-share holders and firms without state-owned shares. Moreover, the top management turnover in firms with corporate state-share holders is not more sensitive to poor firm performance than it is in firms without state-owned shares. The results suggest that it is the incentive of state-share holders, rather than state ownership per se, that is crucial in corporate governance for transitional economies. |
format |
text |
author |
WANG, Jiwei |
author_facet |
WANG, Jiwei |
author_sort |
WANG, Jiwei |
title |
Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies |
title_short |
Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies |
title_full |
Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies |
title_fullStr |
Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Governance Role of Different Types of State-Share Holders: Evidence from China's Listed Companies |
title_sort |
governance role of different types of state-share holders: evidence from china's listed companies |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2003 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/295 http://lbxml.ust.hk/th_imgo/b796733.pdf |
_version_ |
1770568729157959680 |