Do Analyst Regulations Work? Evidence from the Impact of NASD Rule 2711 on the Liquidity Changes Surrounding Coverage Initiations
We investigate the net effect of NASD Rule 2711 on information intermediary role of analysts by examining the market reaction and changes in liquidity surrounding coverage initiations in the pre- and post- regulation periods. This regulation was intended to eliminate conflict of interests faced by a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | RANASINGHE, Tharindra, SHROFF, A, SIVARAMAKRI, S |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1021 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Do Analyst Regulations Work? Evidence from the Impact of NASD Rule 2711 on the Liquidity Changes Surrounding Coverage Initiations
by: RANASINGHE, Tharindra, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Do Analyst Regulations Work? Evidence from the Impact of NASD Rule 2711 on the Liquidity Changes Surrounding Coverage Initiations
by: RANASINGHE, Tharindra, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Do Analyst Regulations Work? Evidence from the Impact of NASD Rule 2711 on the Liquidity Changes Surrounding Coverage Initiations
by: RANASINGHE, Tharindra, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Regulating Analysts: NASD Rule 2711's Impact on Market Reaction and Liquidity Changes Surrounding Coverage Initiations
by: RANASINGHE, Tharindra, et al.
Published: (2012) -
NASD Rule 2711 and Changes in Analysts' Independence in Making Stock Recommendations
by: CHEN, Chih-Ying, et al.
Published: (2009)