Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7

Using a balance sheet valuation model, this study examines if information on the fair value hierarchy of on-balance sheet financial assets and financial liabilities are incorporated in the market’s valuation of companies’ equities in Singapore. The results of the study show significant associations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TAN, Pearl
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
OCI
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1457
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2456/viewcontent/FairValueHierarchyMeasures_2015_GSTFJBR.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soa_research-2456
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soa_research-24562023-10-11T07:15:12Z Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7 TAN, Pearl Using a balance sheet valuation model, this study examines if information on the fair value hierarchy of on-balance sheet financial assets and financial liabilities are incorporated in the market’s valuation of companies’ equities in Singapore. The results of the study show significant associations between as-reported Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measures of financial assets and market values. However, the results are not significant for Level 3 fair value measures of financial assets and each of the three levels of fair value measures of financial liabilities. The results also show that returns are more positively associated with as-reported gains and losses from Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measures than those from Level 3 fair value measures. Overall, the evidence suggests that information on the fair value hierarchy of IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures are used by market participants in their pricing decisions. The market however appears to place greater weights on fair value changes taken to the income statement than those taken to OCI, notwithstanding the level of the fair value measure. While the fixation with income statement measures remains a puzzle, the results are consistent with prior studies that show that investors largely ignore OCI in their pricing of shares. 2015-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1457 info:doi/10.7603/s40706-015-0013-6 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2456/viewcontent/FairValueHierarchyMeasures_2015_GSTFJBR.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Fair Value Hierarchy IFRS Disclosure OCI Accounting Asian Studies Corporate Finance
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Fair Value Hierarchy
IFRS
Disclosure
OCI
Accounting
Asian Studies
Corporate Finance
spellingShingle Fair Value Hierarchy
IFRS
Disclosure
OCI
Accounting
Asian Studies
Corporate Finance
TAN, Pearl
Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7
description Using a balance sheet valuation model, this study examines if information on the fair value hierarchy of on-balance sheet financial assets and financial liabilities are incorporated in the market’s valuation of companies’ equities in Singapore. The results of the study show significant associations between as-reported Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measures of financial assets and market values. However, the results are not significant for Level 3 fair value measures of financial assets and each of the three levels of fair value measures of financial liabilities. The results also show that returns are more positively associated with as-reported gains and losses from Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measures than those from Level 3 fair value measures. Overall, the evidence suggests that information on the fair value hierarchy of IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures are used by market participants in their pricing decisions. The market however appears to place greater weights on fair value changes taken to the income statement than those taken to OCI, notwithstanding the level of the fair value measure. While the fixation with income statement measures remains a puzzle, the results are consistent with prior studies that show that investors largely ignore OCI in their pricing of shares.
format text
author TAN, Pearl
author_facet TAN, Pearl
author_sort TAN, Pearl
title Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7
title_short Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7
title_full Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7
title_fullStr Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7
title_full_unstemmed Fair value hierarchy measures: Post-implementation evidence on IFRS 7
title_sort fair value hierarchy measures: post-implementation evidence on ifrs 7
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1457
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2456/viewcontent/FairValueHierarchyMeasures_2015_GSTFJBR.pdf
_version_ 1781793941167800320