Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information

This paper reports the results of an experiment investigating how directors’ identification and evaluation of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information in a financial statement fraud risk assessment setting affects dilution in their risk assessments. My results show that more (less) diluted risk ass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SEOW, Jean Lin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1567
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soa_research-2594
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soa_research-25942017-08-08T09:48:07Z Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information SEOW, Jean Lin This paper reports the results of an experiment investigating how directors’ identification and evaluation of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information in a financial statement fraud risk assessment setting affects dilution in their risk assessments. My results show that more (less) diluted risk assessments are made when more (fewer) nondiagnostic factors are identified and where less (more) weight is placed on non-diagnostic factors identified as relevant to the judgment decision. Directors with higher levels of technical knowledge are found to identify more diagnostic factors and place greater weight on these factors than directors with lower levels of technical knowledge. Higher levels of technical knowledge are also associated with marginally lower weights placed on nondiagnostic factors and a resultant lower susceptibility to dilution in judgment decisions. Audit committee members with higher levels of technical knowledge are also found to make less diluted risk assessments. Directors who possess lower levels of technical knowledge are found to be unable to bridge the ‘gap’ in their performance compared to directors with higher technical knowledge even with the assistance of a decision aid. Collectively, these findings indicate that technical knowledge is a key driver in the ability of directors to identify and evaluate risk factors, and that any lack of technical knowledge may not easily be supplemented with decision aids. The findings also suggest that some commonly-used measures of director task expertise and competence may be inappropriate proxies for their risk assessment capabilities. 2014-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1567 info:doi/10.21102/jbpr.2014.07.91.02 Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Directors Risk Assessments Dilution Technical Knowledge Decision Aids Accounting
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Directors
Risk Assessments
Dilution
Technical Knowledge
Decision Aids
Accounting
spellingShingle Directors
Risk Assessments
Dilution
Technical Knowledge
Decision Aids
Accounting
SEOW, Jean Lin
Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information
description This paper reports the results of an experiment investigating how directors’ identification and evaluation of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information in a financial statement fraud risk assessment setting affects dilution in their risk assessments. My results show that more (less) diluted risk assessments are made when more (fewer) nondiagnostic factors are identified and where less (more) weight is placed on non-diagnostic factors identified as relevant to the judgment decision. Directors with higher levels of technical knowledge are found to identify more diagnostic factors and place greater weight on these factors than directors with lower levels of technical knowledge. Higher levels of technical knowledge are also associated with marginally lower weights placed on nondiagnostic factors and a resultant lower susceptibility to dilution in judgment decisions. Audit committee members with higher levels of technical knowledge are also found to make less diluted risk assessments. Directors who possess lower levels of technical knowledge are found to be unable to bridge the ‘gap’ in their performance compared to directors with higher technical knowledge even with the assistance of a decision aid. Collectively, these findings indicate that technical knowledge is a key driver in the ability of directors to identify and evaluate risk factors, and that any lack of technical knowledge may not easily be supplemented with decision aids. The findings also suggest that some commonly-used measures of director task expertise and competence may be inappropriate proxies for their risk assessment capabilities.
format text
author SEOW, Jean Lin
author_facet SEOW, Jean Lin
author_sort SEOW, Jean Lin
title Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information
title_short Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information
title_full Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information
title_fullStr Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information
title_full_unstemmed Dilution in director risk assessments: The effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information
title_sort dilution in director risk assessments: the effects of diagnostic and non-diagnostic information
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2014
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1567
_version_ 1770573475536175104