Takeover defenses in the era of shareholder activism

This paper examines the interplay between takeover defenses and shareholder activism. Using a comprehensive sample of shareholder activism events between 2006 and 2014, I find a differential impact of takeover defense measures on the likelihood of being targeted for activism; a dual-class structure...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: SHIN, Sa-Pyung Sean
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1578
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2605/viewcontent/SSRN_id2842695.pdf
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Singapore Management University
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:This paper examines the interplay between takeover defenses and shareholder activism. Using a comprehensive sample of shareholder activism events between 2006 and 2014, I find a differential impact of takeover defense measures on the likelihood of being targeted for activism; a dual-class structure or a staggered board deters activism, whereas firms with a poison pill in place are more likely to become targets. Activists are more likely to demand removal of takeover defense measures and/or sale of the target firm if the firm has a staggered board or a poison pill in place, suggesting that when takeover defenses block the market for corporate control, activists promote changes through their interventions. I also find that target firms with takeover defenses are more likely to remove those defenses and more likely to be acquired following activism, which suggests that activism can act as an antidote to takeover defenses. Finally, while many target firms adopt a poison pill in response to activist approaches, I do not find evidence that it makes for an effective defense.