The limitation on benefits provision in BEPS Action 6/Multilateral Instrument: Ineffective overreaction of mind-numbing complexity: Part 2
This is the second part of a comprehensive two-part article addressing the usefulness of the limitation on benefits (LOB) provision in base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) Action 6 and the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1771 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | This is the second part of a comprehensive two-part article addressing the usefulness of the limitation on benefits (LOB) provision in base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) Action 6 and the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI) in prevention of abusive treaty shopping-the most prevalent and typical form of treaty abuse. The study concludes that the MLI LOB rule is an ineffective overreaction of 'mind-numbing complexity' which, despite its great potential to reflect the nature of tax treaties and treaty shopping, seems to be a lost opportunity to address that most prevalent form of treaty abuse in a targeted, effective manner. After a critical analysis, de lege ferenda conclusions will follow. |
|---|