Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process
Students' evaluation of teaching (SET) is widely adopted in most universities. Besides allowing teachers to improve their teaching, SET offers an important input for university administrators' consideration in faculty promotion, contract renewal, salary increase and teaching award. While t...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1927 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2954/viewcontent/StudentEvaluation_2021_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-2954 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-29542024-04-23T06:53:23Z Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process PAN, Gary SHANKARARAMAN, Venky KOH, Kevin GAN, Sandy Students' evaluation of teaching (SET) is widely adopted in most universities. Besides allowing teachers to improve their teaching, SET offers an important input for university administrators' consideration in faculty promotion, contract renewal, salary increase and teaching award. While the practice of using SET instrument is well established, it remains ambiguous in the SET literature whether a dedicated SET instrument is used for alternative teaching pedagogy. Our paper argues that SET instrument may need to be re-designed to reflect the idiosyncrasy of another teaching pedagogy. Accordingly, this paper presents the development process of a SET instrument used to measure an alternative teaching pedagogy in project-based learning. By drawing upon a case study of a university in Singapore, we demonstrate the development of a SET instrument and highlight the considerations surfaced during the development process. Our findings showed that active involvement of students and faculty in the development process proved to be important for the successful development and implementation of SET instrument. The paper concludes with implications for research and education, and limitation of this study. 2021-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1927 info:doi/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100501 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2954/viewcontent/StudentEvaluation_2021_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Project-based learning Students' evaluation of teaching instrument Development process Asian Studies Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Higher Education |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Project-based learning Students' evaluation of teaching instrument Development process Asian Studies Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Higher Education |
spellingShingle |
Project-based learning Students' evaluation of teaching instrument Development process Asian Studies Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Higher Education PAN, Gary SHANKARARAMAN, Venky KOH, Kevin GAN, Sandy Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process |
description |
Students' evaluation of teaching (SET) is widely adopted in most universities. Besides allowing teachers to improve their teaching, SET offers an important input for university administrators' consideration in faculty promotion, contract renewal, salary increase and teaching award. While the practice of using SET instrument is well established, it remains ambiguous in the SET literature whether a dedicated SET instrument is used for alternative teaching pedagogy. Our paper argues that SET instrument may need to be re-designed to reflect the idiosyncrasy of another teaching pedagogy. Accordingly, this paper presents the development process of a SET instrument used to measure an alternative teaching pedagogy in project-based learning. By drawing upon a case study of a university in Singapore, we demonstrate the development of a SET instrument and highlight the considerations surfaced during the development process. Our findings showed that active involvement of students and faculty in the development process proved to be important for the successful development and implementation of SET instrument. The paper concludes with implications for research and education, and limitation of this study. |
format |
text |
author |
PAN, Gary SHANKARARAMAN, Venky KOH, Kevin GAN, Sandy |
author_facet |
PAN, Gary SHANKARARAMAN, Venky KOH, Kevin GAN, Sandy |
author_sort |
PAN, Gary |
title |
Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process |
title_short |
Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process |
title_full |
Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process |
title_fullStr |
Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process |
title_sort |
students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: an instrument and a development process |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1927 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2954/viewcontent/StudentEvaluation_2021_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047503534784512 |