Business combinations under common control (Part 2)

In Part 1 of the article, published in the March issue of this IS Chartered Accountant Journal, we explained the conditions for a BCUCC and the two methods of accounting for BCUCC. We also explained how accounting standards need to address the gap in accounting for the BCUCC from the receiving entit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TAN, Pearl Hock-neo, LIM, Chu Yeong, ZHANG, Tracey Chunqi
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1931
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2958/viewcontent/BizCombinations2_2021_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soa_research-2958
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soa_research-29582022-02-07T03:49:24Z Business combinations under common control (Part 2) TAN, Pearl Hock-neo LIM, Chu Yeong ZHANG, Tracey Chunqi In Part 1 of the article, published in the March issue of this IS Chartered Accountant Journal, we explained the conditions for a BCUCC and the two methods of accounting for BCUCC. We also explained how accounting standards need to address the gap in accounting for the BCUCC from the receiving entity’s perspective. In this Part 2 of the article, we propose a contextual approach in determining the accounting method on BCUCC for the receiving entity (that is, the entity which receives control of the transferred entity from another group entity). We propose that a BCUCC that has commercial substance and which results in a change in the timing, amount and variability of cashflows of the receiving entity and its subsidiaries should be accounted as an acquisition under IFRS 3. The acquisition method better serves the information needs of the non-controlling interests and external stakeholders of the receiving entity when there is a real economic change of the receiving entity and its sub-group. We illustrate this point in the case study below. The lack of arm’s-length pricing does not pose insurmountable measurement issues and should not be the basis for the accounting choice. 2021-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1931 info:doi/https://journal.isca.org.sg/2021/04/05/dons-column-business-combinations-under-common-control-part-2/pugpig_index.html https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2958/viewcontent/BizCombinations2_2021_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business Combination Common Control IFRS Group Accounting Accounting Corporate Finance
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Business Combination
Common Control
IFRS
Group Accounting
Accounting
Corporate Finance
spellingShingle Business Combination
Common Control
IFRS
Group Accounting
Accounting
Corporate Finance
TAN, Pearl Hock-neo
LIM, Chu Yeong
ZHANG, Tracey Chunqi
Business combinations under common control (Part 2)
description In Part 1 of the article, published in the March issue of this IS Chartered Accountant Journal, we explained the conditions for a BCUCC and the two methods of accounting for BCUCC. We also explained how accounting standards need to address the gap in accounting for the BCUCC from the receiving entity’s perspective. In this Part 2 of the article, we propose a contextual approach in determining the accounting method on BCUCC for the receiving entity (that is, the entity which receives control of the transferred entity from another group entity). We propose that a BCUCC that has commercial substance and which results in a change in the timing, amount and variability of cashflows of the receiving entity and its subsidiaries should be accounted as an acquisition under IFRS 3. The acquisition method better serves the information needs of the non-controlling interests and external stakeholders of the receiving entity when there is a real economic change of the receiving entity and its sub-group. We illustrate this point in the case study below. The lack of arm’s-length pricing does not pose insurmountable measurement issues and should not be the basis for the accounting choice.
format text
author TAN, Pearl Hock-neo
LIM, Chu Yeong
ZHANG, Tracey Chunqi
author_facet TAN, Pearl Hock-neo
LIM, Chu Yeong
ZHANG, Tracey Chunqi
author_sort TAN, Pearl Hock-neo
title Business combinations under common control (Part 2)
title_short Business combinations under common control (Part 2)
title_full Business combinations under common control (Part 2)
title_fullStr Business combinations under common control (Part 2)
title_full_unstemmed Business combinations under common control (Part 2)
title_sort business combinations under common control (part 2)
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1931
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/2958/viewcontent/BizCombinations2_2021_av.pdf
_version_ 1770576087106977792