Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock

Despite a longstanding debate over the pros and cons of imposing legal liability on directors and officers (D&Os), there is limited evidence on how D&O liability affects corporate innovation. We study this question by exploiting Nevada's 2001 corporate law change that dramatically lower...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: WANG, Xin, XU, Yongxin, ZHANG, Liandong, ZHENG, Gaoping
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soa_research-3033
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soa_research-30332023-05-11T08:42:02Z Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock WANG, Xin XU, Yongxin ZHANG, Liandong ZHENG, Gaoping Despite a longstanding debate over the pros and cons of imposing legal liability on directors and officers (D&Os), there is limited evidence on how D&O liability affects corporate innovation. We study this question by exploiting Nevada's 2001 corporate law change that dramatically lowered D&O legal liability and helped Nevada become the second most popular state for out-of-state incorporations. We find that firms incorporated in Nevada exhibit an increase in innovation outputs relative to matched control firms after the law change, particularly firms facing higher litigation risk or operating in more innovative industries. The results are driven mainly by exchange-listed firms that are subject to better governance than over-the-counter (OTC) listed firms. Lower D&O liability also enables firms to pursue more risky, but potentially more rewarding, explorative innovation. Therefore, although holding D&Os liable may be desirable overall, it also entails a cost by discouraging innovation in some firms. Our study has implications for how the litigation environment may influence sustainable growth via innovation. 2021-08-14T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2006 info:doi/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102022 Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University D&O liability legal liability directors officers corporate innovation Nevada corporate law innovation outputs litigation risk innovative industries governance exchange-listed firms over-the-counter listed firms risky innovation explorative innovation sustainable growth litigation environment Accounting
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic D&O liability
legal liability
directors
officers
corporate innovation
Nevada corporate law
innovation outputs
litigation risk
innovative industries
governance
exchange-listed firms
over-the-counter listed firms
risky innovation
explorative innovation
sustainable growth
litigation environment
Accounting
spellingShingle D&O liability
legal liability
directors
officers
corporate innovation
Nevada corporate law
innovation outputs
litigation risk
innovative industries
governance
exchange-listed firms
over-the-counter listed firms
risky innovation
explorative innovation
sustainable growth
litigation environment
Accounting
WANG, Xin
XU, Yongxin
ZHANG, Liandong
ZHENG, Gaoping
Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock
description Despite a longstanding debate over the pros and cons of imposing legal liability on directors and officers (D&Os), there is limited evidence on how D&O liability affects corporate innovation. We study this question by exploiting Nevada's 2001 corporate law change that dramatically lowered D&O legal liability and helped Nevada become the second most popular state for out-of-state incorporations. We find that firms incorporated in Nevada exhibit an increase in innovation outputs relative to matched control firms after the law change, particularly firms facing higher litigation risk or operating in more innovative industries. The results are driven mainly by exchange-listed firms that are subject to better governance than over-the-counter (OTC) listed firms. Lower D&O liability also enables firms to pursue more risky, but potentially more rewarding, explorative innovation. Therefore, although holding D&Os liable may be desirable overall, it also entails a cost by discouraging innovation in some firms. Our study has implications for how the litigation environment may influence sustainable growth via innovation.
format text
author WANG, Xin
XU, Yongxin
ZHANG, Liandong
ZHENG, Gaoping
author_facet WANG, Xin
XU, Yongxin
ZHANG, Liandong
ZHENG, Gaoping
author_sort WANG, Xin
title Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock
title_short Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock
title_full Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock
title_fullStr Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock
title_full_unstemmed Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock
title_sort managerial liability and corporate innovation: evidence from a legal shock
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2006
_version_ 1770576520007385088