Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock
Despite a longstanding debate over the pros and cons of imposing legal liability on directors and officers (D&Os), there is limited evidence on how D&O liability affects corporate innovation. We study this question by exploiting Nevada's 2001 corporate law change that dramatically lower...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2006 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-3033 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-30332023-05-11T08:42:02Z Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock WANG, Xin XU, Yongxin ZHANG, Liandong ZHENG, Gaoping Despite a longstanding debate over the pros and cons of imposing legal liability on directors and officers (D&Os), there is limited evidence on how D&O liability affects corporate innovation. We study this question by exploiting Nevada's 2001 corporate law change that dramatically lowered D&O legal liability and helped Nevada become the second most popular state for out-of-state incorporations. We find that firms incorporated in Nevada exhibit an increase in innovation outputs relative to matched control firms after the law change, particularly firms facing higher litigation risk or operating in more innovative industries. The results are driven mainly by exchange-listed firms that are subject to better governance than over-the-counter (OTC) listed firms. Lower D&O liability also enables firms to pursue more risky, but potentially more rewarding, explorative innovation. Therefore, although holding D&Os liable may be desirable overall, it also entails a cost by discouraging innovation in some firms. Our study has implications for how the litigation environment may influence sustainable growth via innovation. 2021-08-14T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2006 info:doi/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102022 Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University D&O liability legal liability directors officers corporate innovation Nevada corporate law innovation outputs litigation risk innovative industries governance exchange-listed firms over-the-counter listed firms risky innovation explorative innovation sustainable growth litigation environment Accounting |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
D&O liability legal liability directors officers corporate innovation Nevada corporate law innovation outputs litigation risk innovative industries governance exchange-listed firms over-the-counter listed firms risky innovation explorative innovation sustainable growth litigation environment Accounting |
spellingShingle |
D&O liability legal liability directors officers corporate innovation Nevada corporate law innovation outputs litigation risk innovative industries governance exchange-listed firms over-the-counter listed firms risky innovation explorative innovation sustainable growth litigation environment Accounting WANG, Xin XU, Yongxin ZHANG, Liandong ZHENG, Gaoping Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock |
description |
Despite a longstanding debate over the pros and cons of imposing legal liability on directors and officers (D&Os), there is limited evidence on how D&O liability affects corporate innovation. We study this question by exploiting Nevada's 2001 corporate law change that dramatically lowered D&O legal liability and helped Nevada become the second most popular state for out-of-state incorporations. We find that firms incorporated in Nevada exhibit an increase in innovation outputs relative to matched control firms after the law change, particularly firms facing higher litigation risk or operating in more innovative industries. The results are driven mainly by exchange-listed firms that are subject to better governance than over-the-counter (OTC) listed firms. Lower D&O liability also enables firms to pursue more risky, but potentially more rewarding, explorative innovation. Therefore, although holding D&Os liable may be desirable overall, it also entails a cost by discouraging innovation in some firms. Our study has implications for how the litigation environment may influence sustainable growth via innovation. |
format |
text |
author |
WANG, Xin XU, Yongxin ZHANG, Liandong ZHENG, Gaoping |
author_facet |
WANG, Xin XU, Yongxin ZHANG, Liandong ZHENG, Gaoping |
author_sort |
WANG, Xin |
title |
Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock |
title_short |
Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock |
title_full |
Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock |
title_fullStr |
Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock |
title_sort |
managerial liability and corporate innovation: evidence from a legal shock |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2006 |
_version_ |
1770576520007385088 |