"Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA?
This study examines whether multinational corporations (MNCs) reclassify related-party payments to avoid the new base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT). The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 included the BEAT to combat income shifting from the U.S. to foreign entities. An exclusion in the tax law prov...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2023 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/3050/viewcontent/JustBEATit_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-3050 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soa_research-30502024-05-09T02:20:32Z "Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? LAPLANTE, Stacie O. LEWELLEN, Christina M. PYNCH, Daniel P. SAMUEL, Daniel M. P. This study examines whether multinational corporations (MNCs) reclassify related-party payments to avoid the new base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT). The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 included the BEAT to combat income shifting from the U.S. to foreign entities. An exclusion in the tax law provides MNCs an incentive to reclassify related-party payments as cost of goods sold. We use a triple-difference design that leverages the BEAT filing threshold of $500 million in revenue and the parent company’s location to document increases in the unconsolidated sales of foreign subsidiaries of MNCs subject to BEAT relative foreign subsidiaries of MNCs not subject to BEAT consistent with cost reclassification. We also find this effect is strongest in MNCs with more related-party payments. Overall, our results imply that firms use the subjectivity inherent in cost classification to reclassify costs as cost of goods sold to avoid the BEAT. 2024-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2023 info:doi/10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101648 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/3050/viewcontent/JustBEATit_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Tax planning income shifting cost reclassification foreign tax tax TCJA BEAT Accounting Corporate Finance |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Tax planning income shifting cost reclassification foreign tax tax TCJA BEAT Accounting Corporate Finance |
spellingShingle |
Tax planning income shifting cost reclassification foreign tax tax TCJA BEAT Accounting Corporate Finance LAPLANTE, Stacie O. LEWELLEN, Christina M. PYNCH, Daniel P. SAMUEL, Daniel M. P. "Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? |
description |
This study examines whether multinational corporations (MNCs) reclassify related-party payments to avoid the new base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT). The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 included the BEAT to combat income shifting from the U.S. to foreign entities. An exclusion in the tax law provides MNCs an incentive to reclassify related-party payments as cost of goods sold. We use a triple-difference design that leverages the BEAT filing threshold of $500 million in revenue and the parent company’s location to document increases in the unconsolidated sales of foreign subsidiaries of MNCs subject to BEAT relative foreign subsidiaries of MNCs not subject to BEAT consistent with cost reclassification. We also find this effect is strongest in MNCs with more related-party payments. Overall, our results imply that firms use the subjectivity inherent in cost classification to reclassify costs as cost of goods sold to avoid the BEAT. |
format |
text |
author |
LAPLANTE, Stacie O. LEWELLEN, Christina M. PYNCH, Daniel P. SAMUEL, Daniel M. P. |
author_facet |
LAPLANTE, Stacie O. LEWELLEN, Christina M. PYNCH, Daniel P. SAMUEL, Daniel M. P. |
author_sort |
LAPLANTE, Stacie O. |
title |
"Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? |
title_short |
"Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? |
title_full |
"Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? |
title_fullStr |
"Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? |
title_full_unstemmed |
"Just BEAT it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) of the TCJA? |
title_sort |
"just beat it" do firms reclassify costs to avoid the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (beat) of the tcja? |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2023 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/3050/viewcontent/JustBEATit_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047537896620032 |