Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy

Decisions in organizations are often jointly made by individuals whose interests need not coincide. Even if they do, the quality of the decision depends crucially on the manner in which individual opinions are aggregated. This paper develops a model to analyse joint decision-making in large organiza...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Koh, Winston T. H.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/188
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1187
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-11872010-09-23T05:48:03Z Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy Koh, Winston T. H. Decisions in organizations are often jointly made by individuals whose interests need not coincide. Even if they do, the quality of the decision depends crucially on the manner in which individual opinions are aggregated. This paper develops a model to analyse joint decision-making in large organizations under the key assumption that perfect information is impossible, so that human fallibility is present. The aim of the paper is to formalise some of the intuition associated with sequential decision-making in two stylised decision structures, namely: hierarchy and polyarchy. Incentive problems in the presence of human fallibility are also considered. 1992-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/188 info:doi/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90014-3 Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Economics
spellingShingle Economics
Koh, Winston T. H.
Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy
description Decisions in organizations are often jointly made by individuals whose interests need not coincide. Even if they do, the quality of the decision depends crucially on the manner in which individual opinions are aggregated. This paper develops a model to analyse joint decision-making in large organizations under the key assumption that perfect information is impossible, so that human fallibility is present. The aim of the paper is to formalise some of the intuition associated with sequential decision-making in two stylised decision structures, namely: hierarchy and polyarchy. Incentive problems in the presence of human fallibility are also considered.
format text
author Koh, Winston T. H.
author_facet Koh, Winston T. H.
author_sort Koh, Winston T. H.
title Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy
title_short Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy
title_full Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy
title_fullStr Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy
title_full_unstemmed Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy
title_sort human fallibility and sequential decision-making: hierarchy versus polyarchy
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 1992
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/188
_version_ 1770569061827084288