Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation

What is the interpretation of a confidence interval following estimation of a Box-Cox transformation parameter ?? Several authors have argued that confidence intervals for linear model parameters ? can be constructed as if ? were known in advance, rather than estimated, provided the estimand is inte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hooper, P. M., YANG, Zhenlin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/296
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1295
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-12952010-09-23T05:48:03Z Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation Hooper, P. M. YANG, Zhenlin What is the interpretation of a confidence interval following estimation of a Box-Cox transformation parameter ?? Several authors have argued that confidence intervals for linear model parameters ? can be constructed as if ? were known in advance, rather than estimated, provided the estimand is interpreted conditionally given ??. If the estimand is defined as ? (??), a function of the estimated transformation, can the nominal confidence level be regarded as a conditional coverage probability given ??, where the interval is random and the estimand is fixed? Or should it be regarded as an unconditional probability, where both the interval and the estimand are random? This article investigates these questions via large-n approximations, small-? approximations, and simulations. It is shown that, when model assumptions are satisfied and n is large, the nominal confidence level closely approximates the conditional coverage probability. When n is small, this conditional approximation is still good for regression models with small error variance. The conditional approximation can be poor for regression models with moderate error variance and single-factor ANOVA models with small to moderate error variance. In these situations the nominal confidence level still provides a good approximation for the unconditional coverage probability. This suggests that, while the estimand may be interpreted conditionally, the confidence level should sometimes be interpreted unconditionally. 1997-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/296 info:doi/10.2307/3315787 Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Econometrics Medicine and Health Sciences
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Econometrics
Medicine and Health Sciences
spellingShingle Econometrics
Medicine and Health Sciences
Hooper, P. M.
YANG, Zhenlin
Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation
description What is the interpretation of a confidence interval following estimation of a Box-Cox transformation parameter ?? Several authors have argued that confidence intervals for linear model parameters ? can be constructed as if ? were known in advance, rather than estimated, provided the estimand is interpreted conditionally given ??. If the estimand is defined as ? (??), a function of the estimated transformation, can the nominal confidence level be regarded as a conditional coverage probability given ??, where the interval is random and the estimand is fixed? Or should it be regarded as an unconditional probability, where both the interval and the estimand are random? This article investigates these questions via large-n approximations, small-? approximations, and simulations. It is shown that, when model assumptions are satisfied and n is large, the nominal confidence level closely approximates the conditional coverage probability. When n is small, this conditional approximation is still good for regression models with small error variance. The conditional approximation can be poor for regression models with moderate error variance and single-factor ANOVA models with small to moderate error variance. In these situations the nominal confidence level still provides a good approximation for the unconditional coverage probability. This suggests that, while the estimand may be interpreted conditionally, the confidence level should sometimes be interpreted unconditionally.
format text
author Hooper, P. M.
YANG, Zhenlin
author_facet Hooper, P. M.
YANG, Zhenlin
author_sort Hooper, P. M.
title Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation
title_short Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation
title_full Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation
title_fullStr Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation
title_full_unstemmed Confidence Intervals Following Box-Cox Transformation
title_sort confidence intervals following box-cox transformation
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 1997
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/296
_version_ 1770569102459404288