Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome
Limb salvage after primary site failure of extremity soft tissue sarcoma is a challenging problem. Amputation may be the most effective treatment option in selected patients with local recurrence. We compared the outcome of patients treated with amputation versus limb-sparing surgery (LSS) for local...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2001
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/466 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1465 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-14652010-09-23T05:48:03Z Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome Stojadinovic, A. Jaques, D. P. Leung, Denis H. Y. Healey, J. Brennan, M. F. Limb salvage after primary site failure of extremity soft tissue sarcoma is a challenging problem. Amputation may be the most effective treatment option in selected patients with local recurrence. We compared the outcome of patients treated with amputation versus limb-sparing surgery (LSS) for locally recurrent extremity sarcoma. Methods: From 1982 to 2000, 1178 patients with localized primary extremity sarcoma underwent LSS. Of these, 204 (17%) developed local recurrence. Eighteen (9%) required major amputation and the remainder underwent LSS, of which 34 were selected for matched-pair analysis according to established prognostic variables. Rates of recurrence or death were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Following adjustment for prognostic variables, a Mantel-Haenszel test was used to compare the outcome between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients in each group were well matched. All patients had high-grade tumors deep to the fascia. Median time to local recurrence was similar for both groups. Median follow-up was 95 months. Amputation was associated with a significant improvement in local control of disease (94% vs. 74%; P = .04). We observed no difference in disease-free ( P = .48), disease-specific ( P = .74), or overall survival ( P = .93) between the two groups. Median postrecurrence survival was 20 months and 5-year OS was 36% for the entire study group. Conclusions: Limb-sparing treatment achieves local control in the majority of recurrent extremity sarcomas for which amputation is infrequently indicated. Amputation improves local disease control but not survival under these circumstances. 2001-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/466 info:doi/10.1007/s10434-001-0509-3 Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Econometrics Medicine and Health Sciences |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Econometrics Medicine and Health Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Econometrics Medicine and Health Sciences Stojadinovic, A. Jaques, D. P. Leung, Denis H. Y. Healey, J. Brennan, M. F. Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome |
description |
Limb salvage after primary site failure of extremity soft tissue sarcoma is a challenging problem. Amputation may be the most effective treatment option in selected patients with local recurrence. We compared the outcome of patients treated with amputation versus limb-sparing surgery (LSS) for locally recurrent extremity sarcoma. Methods: From 1982 to 2000, 1178 patients with localized primary extremity sarcoma underwent LSS. Of these, 204 (17%) developed local recurrence. Eighteen (9%) required major amputation and the remainder underwent LSS, of which 34 were selected for matched-pair analysis according to established prognostic variables. Rates of recurrence or death were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Following adjustment for prognostic variables, a Mantel-Haenszel test was used to compare the outcome between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients in each group were well matched. All patients had high-grade tumors deep to the fascia. Median time to local recurrence was similar for both groups. Median follow-up was 95 months. Amputation was associated with a significant improvement in local control of disease (94% vs. 74%; P = .04). We observed no difference in disease-free ( P = .48), disease-specific ( P = .74), or overall survival ( P = .93) between the two groups. Median postrecurrence survival was 20 months and 5-year OS was 36% for the entire study group. Conclusions: Limb-sparing treatment achieves local control in the majority of recurrent extremity sarcomas for which amputation is infrequently indicated. Amputation improves local disease control but not survival under these circumstances. |
format |
text |
author |
Stojadinovic, A. Jaques, D. P. Leung, Denis H. Y. Healey, J. Brennan, M. F. |
author_facet |
Stojadinovic, A. Jaques, D. P. Leung, Denis H. Y. Healey, J. Brennan, M. F. |
author_sort |
Stojadinovic, A. |
title |
Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome |
title_short |
Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome |
title_full |
Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome |
title_fullStr |
Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome |
title_full_unstemmed |
Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome |
title_sort |
amputation for recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: indications and outcome |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2001 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/466 |
_version_ |
1770569183476580352 |