Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome

Limb salvage after primary site failure of extremity soft tissue sarcoma is a challenging problem. Amputation may be the most effective treatment option in selected patients with local recurrence. We compared the outcome of patients treated with amputation versus limb-sparing surgery (LSS) for local...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stojadinovic, A., Jaques, D. P., Leung, Denis H. Y., Healey, J., Brennan, M. F.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/466
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1465
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-14652010-09-23T05:48:03Z Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome Stojadinovic, A. Jaques, D. P. Leung, Denis H. Y. Healey, J. Brennan, M. F. Limb salvage after primary site failure of extremity soft tissue sarcoma is a challenging problem. Amputation may be the most effective treatment option in selected patients with local recurrence. We compared the outcome of patients treated with amputation versus limb-sparing surgery (LSS) for locally recurrent extremity sarcoma. Methods: From 1982 to 2000, 1178 patients with localized primary extremity sarcoma underwent LSS. Of these, 204 (17%) developed local recurrence. Eighteen (9%) required major amputation and the remainder underwent LSS, of which 34 were selected for matched-pair analysis according to established prognostic variables. Rates of recurrence or death were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Following adjustment for prognostic variables, a Mantel-Haenszel test was used to compare the outcome between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients in each group were well matched. All patients had high-grade tumors deep to the fascia. Median time to local recurrence was similar for both groups. Median follow-up was 95 months. Amputation was associated with a significant improvement in local control of disease (94% vs. 74%; P = .04). We observed no difference in disease-free ( P = .48), disease-specific ( P = .74), or overall survival ( P = .93) between the two groups. Median postrecurrence survival was 20 months and 5-year OS was 36% for the entire study group. Conclusions: Limb-sparing treatment achieves local control in the majority of recurrent extremity sarcomas for which amputation is infrequently indicated. Amputation improves local disease control but not survival under these circumstances. 2001-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/466 info:doi/10.1007/s10434-001-0509-3 Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Econometrics Medicine and Health Sciences
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Econometrics
Medicine and Health Sciences
spellingShingle Econometrics
Medicine and Health Sciences
Stojadinovic, A.
Jaques, D. P.
Leung, Denis H. Y.
Healey, J.
Brennan, M. F.
Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome
description Limb salvage after primary site failure of extremity soft tissue sarcoma is a challenging problem. Amputation may be the most effective treatment option in selected patients with local recurrence. We compared the outcome of patients treated with amputation versus limb-sparing surgery (LSS) for locally recurrent extremity sarcoma. Methods: From 1982 to 2000, 1178 patients with localized primary extremity sarcoma underwent LSS. Of these, 204 (17%) developed local recurrence. Eighteen (9%) required major amputation and the remainder underwent LSS, of which 34 were selected for matched-pair analysis according to established prognostic variables. Rates of recurrence or death were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Following adjustment for prognostic variables, a Mantel-Haenszel test was used to compare the outcome between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients in each group were well matched. All patients had high-grade tumors deep to the fascia. Median time to local recurrence was similar for both groups. Median follow-up was 95 months. Amputation was associated with a significant improvement in local control of disease (94% vs. 74%; P = .04). We observed no difference in disease-free ( P = .48), disease-specific ( P = .74), or overall survival ( P = .93) between the two groups. Median postrecurrence survival was 20 months and 5-year OS was 36% for the entire study group. Conclusions: Limb-sparing treatment achieves local control in the majority of recurrent extremity sarcomas for which amputation is infrequently indicated. Amputation improves local disease control but not survival under these circumstances.
format text
author Stojadinovic, A.
Jaques, D. P.
Leung, Denis H. Y.
Healey, J.
Brennan, M. F.
author_facet Stojadinovic, A.
Jaques, D. P.
Leung, Denis H. Y.
Healey, J.
Brennan, M. F.
author_sort Stojadinovic, A.
title Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome
title_short Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome
title_full Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome
title_fullStr Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Amputation for Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: Indications and Outcome
title_sort amputation for recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: indications and outcome
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2001
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/466
_version_ 1770569183476580352