Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems
Under a sample selection or non-response problem, where a response variable y is observed only when a condition δ = 1 is met, the identified mean E(y|δ = 1) is not equal to the desired mean E(y). But the monotonicity condition E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y|δ = 0) yields an informative bound E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y), wh...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/835 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1834/viewcontent/Monotonicity_2004.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1834 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-18342021-09-02T01:04:11Z Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems Lee, Myoung-jae Under a sample selection or non-response problem, where a response variable y is observed only when a condition δ = 1 is met, the identified mean E(y|δ = 1) is not equal to the desired mean E(y). But the monotonicity condition E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y|δ = 0) yields an informative bound E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y), which is enough for certain inferences. For example, in a majority voting with δ being the vote-turnout, it is enough to know if E(y) > 0.5 or not, for which E(y|δ = 1) > 0.5 is sufficient under the monotonicity. The main question is then whether the monotonicity condition is testable, and if not, when it is plausible. Answering to these queries, when there is a ‘proxy’ variable z related to y but fully observed, we provide a test for the monotonicity; when z is not available, we provide primitive conditions and plausible models for the monotonicity. Going further, when both y and z are binary, bivariate monotonicities of the type P(y, z|δ = 1) ≤ P(y, z|δ = 0) are considered, which can lead to sharper bounds for P(y). As an empirical example, a data set on the 1996 U.S. presidential election is analyzed to see if the Republican candidate could have won had everybody voted, i.e., to see if P(y) > 0.5, where y = 1 is voting for the Republican candidate. 2004-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/835 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1834/viewcontent/Monotonicity_2004.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Imputation Monotonicity Non-response Orthant dependence Sample selection Econometrics |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Imputation Monotonicity Non-response Orthant dependence Sample selection Econometrics |
spellingShingle |
Imputation Monotonicity Non-response Orthant dependence Sample selection Econometrics Lee, Myoung-jae Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems |
description |
Under a sample selection or non-response problem, where a response variable y is observed only when a condition δ = 1 is met, the identified mean E(y|δ = 1) is not equal to the desired mean E(y). But the monotonicity condition E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y|δ = 0) yields an informative bound E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y), which is enough for certain inferences. For example, in a majority voting with δ being the vote-turnout, it is enough to know if E(y) > 0.5 or not, for which E(y|δ = 1) > 0.5 is sufficient under the monotonicity. The main question is then whether the monotonicity condition is testable, and if not, when it is plausible. Answering to these queries, when there is a ‘proxy’ variable z related to y but fully observed, we provide a test for the monotonicity; when z is not available, we provide primitive conditions and plausible models for the monotonicity. Going further, when both y and z are binary, bivariate monotonicities of the type P(y, z|δ = 1) ≤ P(y, z|δ = 0) are considered, which can lead to sharper bounds for P(y). As an empirical example, a data set on the 1996 U.S. presidential election is analyzed to see if the Republican candidate could have won had everybody voted, i.e., to see if P(y) > 0.5, where y = 1 is voting for the Republican candidate. |
format |
text |
author |
Lee, Myoung-jae |
author_facet |
Lee, Myoung-jae |
author_sort |
Lee, Myoung-jae |
title |
Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems |
title_short |
Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems |
title_full |
Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems |
title_fullStr |
Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems |
title_sort |
monotonicity conditions and inequality imputation for sample-selection and non-response problems |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/835 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1834/viewcontent/Monotonicity_2004.pdf |
_version_ |
1770569314155364352 |