Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems

Under a sample selection or non-response problem, where a response variable y is observed only when a condition δ = 1 is met, the identified mean E(y|δ = 1) is not equal to the desired mean E(y). But the monotonicity condition E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y|δ = 0) yields an informative bound E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y), wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lee, Myoung-jae
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/835
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1834/viewcontent/Monotonicity_2004.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-1834
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-18342021-09-02T01:04:11Z Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems Lee, Myoung-jae Under a sample selection or non-response problem, where a response variable y is observed only when a condition δ = 1 is met, the identified mean E(y|δ = 1) is not equal to the desired mean E(y). But the monotonicity condition E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y|δ = 0) yields an informative bound E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y), which is enough for certain inferences. For example, in a majority voting with δ being the vote-turnout, it is enough to know if E(y) > 0.5 or not, for which E(y|δ = 1) > 0.5 is sufficient under the monotonicity. The main question is then whether the monotonicity condition is testable, and if not, when it is plausible. Answering to these queries, when there is a ‘proxy’ variable z related to y but fully observed, we provide a test for the monotonicity; when z is not available, we provide primitive conditions and plausible models for the monotonicity. Going further, when both y and z are binary, bivariate monotonicities of the type P(y, z|δ = 1) ≤ P(y, z|δ = 0) are considered, which can lead to sharper bounds for P(y). As an empirical example, a data set on the 1996 U.S. presidential election is analyzed to see if the Republican candidate could have won had everybody voted, i.e., to see if P(y) > 0.5, where y = 1 is voting for the Republican candidate. 2004-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/835 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1834/viewcontent/Monotonicity_2004.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Imputation Monotonicity Non-response Orthant dependence Sample selection Econometrics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Imputation
Monotonicity
Non-response
Orthant dependence
Sample selection
Econometrics
spellingShingle Imputation
Monotonicity
Non-response
Orthant dependence
Sample selection
Econometrics
Lee, Myoung-jae
Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems
description Under a sample selection or non-response problem, where a response variable y is observed only when a condition δ = 1 is met, the identified mean E(y|δ = 1) is not equal to the desired mean E(y). But the monotonicity condition E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y|δ = 0) yields an informative bound E(y|δ = 1) ≤ E(y), which is enough for certain inferences. For example, in a majority voting with δ being the vote-turnout, it is enough to know if E(y) > 0.5 or not, for which E(y|δ = 1) > 0.5 is sufficient under the monotonicity. The main question is then whether the monotonicity condition is testable, and if not, when it is plausible. Answering to these queries, when there is a ‘proxy’ variable z related to y but fully observed, we provide a test for the monotonicity; when z is not available, we provide primitive conditions and plausible models for the monotonicity. Going further, when both y and z are binary, bivariate monotonicities of the type P(y, z|δ = 1) ≤ P(y, z|δ = 0) are considered, which can lead to sharper bounds for P(y). As an empirical example, a data set on the 1996 U.S. presidential election is analyzed to see if the Republican candidate could have won had everybody voted, i.e., to see if P(y) > 0.5, where y = 1 is voting for the Republican candidate.
format text
author Lee, Myoung-jae
author_facet Lee, Myoung-jae
author_sort Lee, Myoung-jae
title Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems
title_short Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems
title_full Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems
title_fullStr Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems
title_full_unstemmed Monotonicity Conditions and Inequality Imputation for Sample-Selection and Non-Response Problems
title_sort monotonicity conditions and inequality imputation for sample-selection and non-response problems
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2004
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/835
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/1834/viewcontent/Monotonicity_2004.pdf
_version_ 1770569314155364352