Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics

The following essay is a reappraisal of the role of the smooth test proposed by Neyman (1937) in the context of current applications in econometrics. We revisit the derivation of the smooth test and put it into the perspective of the existing literature on tests based on probability integral transfo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BERA, Anil K., GHOSH, Aurobindo
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1059
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2058/viewcontent/SSRN_id272888__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2058
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-20582019-04-27T05:49:19Z Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics BERA, Anil K. GHOSH, Aurobindo The following essay is a reappraisal of the role of the smooth test proposed by Neyman (1937) in the context of current applications in econometrics. We revisit the derivation of the smooth test and put it into the perspective of the existing literature on tests based on probability integral transforms suggested by early pioneers such as R.A.Fisher (1930, 1932) and Karl Pearson (1933, 1934) and the other tests for goodness-of-fit. Our discussion touches data-driven and other methods of testing and inference on the order of the smooth test and the motivation and choice of orthogonal polynomials used by Neyman and others. We review other locally most powerful unbiased tests and look at their differential geometric interpretations in terms of Gaussian curvature of the power hypersurface and review some recent advances. Finally, we venture into some applications in econometrics by evaluating density forecast calibrations discussed by Diebold, Gunther and Tay (1998) and others. We discuss the use of smooth tests in survival analysis as done by Pena (1998), Gray and Pierce (1985) and in tests based on p-values and other probability integral transforms suggested in Meng (1994). Uses in diagnostic analysis of stochastic volatility models are also mentioned. Along with our narrative of the smooth test and its various applications, we also provide some historical anecdotes and sidelights that we think interesting and instructive. 2001-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1059 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2058/viewcontent/SSRN_id272888__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University smooth test goodness-of-fit tests probability integral transform unbiased test score test density forecast evaluation calibration orthogonal polynomials predictive density data-driven methods Econometrics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic smooth test
goodness-of-fit tests
probability integral transform
unbiased test
score test
density forecast evaluation
calibration
orthogonal polynomials
predictive density
data-driven methods
Econometrics
spellingShingle smooth test
goodness-of-fit tests
probability integral transform
unbiased test
score test
density forecast evaluation
calibration
orthogonal polynomials
predictive density
data-driven methods
Econometrics
BERA, Anil K.
GHOSH, Aurobindo
Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics
description The following essay is a reappraisal of the role of the smooth test proposed by Neyman (1937) in the context of current applications in econometrics. We revisit the derivation of the smooth test and put it into the perspective of the existing literature on tests based on probability integral transforms suggested by early pioneers such as R.A.Fisher (1930, 1932) and Karl Pearson (1933, 1934) and the other tests for goodness-of-fit. Our discussion touches data-driven and other methods of testing and inference on the order of the smooth test and the motivation and choice of orthogonal polynomials used by Neyman and others. We review other locally most powerful unbiased tests and look at their differential geometric interpretations in terms of Gaussian curvature of the power hypersurface and review some recent advances. Finally, we venture into some applications in econometrics by evaluating density forecast calibrations discussed by Diebold, Gunther and Tay (1998) and others. We discuss the use of smooth tests in survival analysis as done by Pena (1998), Gray and Pierce (1985) and in tests based on p-values and other probability integral transforms suggested in Meng (1994). Uses in diagnostic analysis of stochastic volatility models are also mentioned. Along with our narrative of the smooth test and its various applications, we also provide some historical anecdotes and sidelights that we think interesting and instructive.
format text
author BERA, Anil K.
GHOSH, Aurobindo
author_facet BERA, Anil K.
GHOSH, Aurobindo
author_sort BERA, Anil K.
title Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics
title_short Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics
title_full Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics
title_fullStr Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics
title_full_unstemmed Neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics
title_sort neyman's smooth test and its use in econometrics
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2001
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1059
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2058/viewcontent/SSRN_id272888__1_.pdf
_version_ 1770569386926538752