Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children

Many men invest in their sisters’ children instead of their wives’. Existing theories addressing such behavior depend on the level of paternity probability in such men’s societies being implausibly low. I link this anthropologically observed investment behavior with the experimentally observed pheno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: GUHA, Brishti
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1406
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2405/viewcontent/33_2012_GamblingonGenes.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2405
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-24052019-04-19T09:51:23Z Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children GUHA, Brishti Many men invest in their sisters’ children instead of their wives’. Existing theories addressing such behavior depend on the level of paternity probability in such men’s societies being implausibly low. I link this anthropologically observed investment behavior with the experimentally observed phenomenon that some individuals are ambiguity averse. Arguing that men’s decisions are made under ambiguity, I show that an increase in ambiguity aversion results in investment in sisters’, rather than wives’, children. I show that this can happen even under risk neutrality. I also consider the special cases of a SEU maximizer and of extreme ambiguity aversion in the Gilboa-Schmeidler sense. Extremely ambiguity averse individuals invest in sister’s children regardless of risk preference or actual paternity rates. An increase in ambiguity, rather than an increase in ambiguity aversion, in contrast, may affect the investment decision either way. When sufficiently many men are ambiguity averse, inheritance norms could become avuncular, affecting women’s incentives and generating a bias towards actual nonpaternity. This is consistent with, but represents an unusual explanation of, data which show correlations between inheritance norms and actual paternity rates. 2012-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1406 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2405/viewcontent/33_2012_GamblingonGenes.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Behavioral Economics Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Behavioral Economics
Economics
spellingShingle Behavioral Economics
Economics
GUHA, Brishti
Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children
description Many men invest in their sisters’ children instead of their wives’. Existing theories addressing such behavior depend on the level of paternity probability in such men’s societies being implausibly low. I link this anthropologically observed investment behavior with the experimentally observed phenomenon that some individuals are ambiguity averse. Arguing that men’s decisions are made under ambiguity, I show that an increase in ambiguity aversion results in investment in sisters’, rather than wives’, children. I show that this can happen even under risk neutrality. I also consider the special cases of a SEU maximizer and of extreme ambiguity aversion in the Gilboa-Schmeidler sense. Extremely ambiguity averse individuals invest in sister’s children regardless of risk preference or actual paternity rates. An increase in ambiguity, rather than an increase in ambiguity aversion, in contrast, may affect the investment decision either way. When sufficiently many men are ambiguity averse, inheritance norms could become avuncular, affecting women’s incentives and generating a bias towards actual nonpaternity. This is consistent with, but represents an unusual explanation of, data which show correlations between inheritance norms and actual paternity rates.
format text
author GUHA, Brishti
author_facet GUHA, Brishti
author_sort GUHA, Brishti
title Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children
title_short Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children
title_full Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children
title_fullStr Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children
title_full_unstemmed Gambling on Genes: Ambiguity Aversion Explains Investment in Sisters' Children
title_sort gambling on genes: ambiguity aversion explains investment in sisters' children
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2012
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1406
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2405/viewcontent/33_2012_GamblingonGenes.pdf
_version_ 1770571321748488192