Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance
In property rights theory, firm is an organizational response to reduce transaction cost associated with hold-up of using market mechanism. We claim that strategic alliance { without changing firm boundaries or asset ownership { is another type of organizational response. We construct a model to inv...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1468 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2467/viewcontent/fixed_learning_cost.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2467 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soe_research-24672019-05-20T07:49:26Z Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance ZHANG, Juyuan ZHANG, Yi In property rights theory, firm is an organizational response to reduce transaction cost associated with hold-up of using market mechanism. We claim that strategic alliance { without changing firm boundaries or asset ownership { is another type of organizational response. We construct a model to investigate individual firms' strategic choice on specialization or diversification when producing intermediate products and their further choice of organizational form: autarchy or forming strategic alliance. We introduce fixed learning costs as an indicator of scales of economy and show that only if fixed learning costs are large enough, will firms have incentive to be specialization and form strategic alliance. We distinguish between asymmetric strategic alliance and symmetric strategic alliance and show that transaction cost is not monotonic with respect to fixed learning costs. In particular, for asymmetric strategic alliance, there exists overinvestment with un-utilized capacity. Further, asymmetric strategic alliance is always unstable, while symmetric strategic alliance is stable only if fixed learning costs are large enough. The firm who is entitled with higher learning cost gets higher payout { rewards for the endeavor. If firms are more patient, they are less likely to form strategic alliance. 2008-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1468 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2467/viewcontent/fixed_learning_cost.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Endogenous Transaction Cost Hold-up Specialization Overinvestment Strategic Alliance Industrial Organization |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Endogenous Transaction Cost Hold-up Specialization Overinvestment Strategic Alliance Industrial Organization |
spellingShingle |
Endogenous Transaction Cost Hold-up Specialization Overinvestment Strategic Alliance Industrial Organization ZHANG, Juyuan ZHANG, Yi Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance |
description |
In property rights theory, firm is an organizational response to reduce transaction cost associated with hold-up of using market mechanism. We claim that strategic alliance { without changing firm boundaries or asset ownership { is another type of organizational response. We construct a model to investigate individual firms' strategic choice on specialization or diversification when producing intermediate products and their further choice of organizational form: autarchy or forming strategic alliance. We introduce fixed learning costs as an indicator of scales of economy and show that only if fixed learning costs are large enough, will firms have incentive to be specialization and form strategic alliance. We distinguish between asymmetric strategic alliance and symmetric strategic alliance and show that transaction cost is not monotonic with respect to fixed learning costs. In particular, for asymmetric strategic alliance, there exists overinvestment with un-utilized capacity. Further, asymmetric strategic alliance is always unstable, while symmetric strategic alliance is stable only if fixed learning costs are large enough. The firm who is entitled with higher learning cost gets higher payout { rewards for the endeavor. If firms are more patient, they are less likely to form strategic alliance. |
format |
text |
author |
ZHANG, Juyuan ZHANG, Yi |
author_facet |
ZHANG, Juyuan ZHANG, Yi |
author_sort |
ZHANG, Juyuan |
title |
Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance |
title_short |
Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance |
title_full |
Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance |
title_fullStr |
Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance |
title_sort |
endogenous transaction cost, specialization, and strategic alliance |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1468 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2467/viewcontent/fixed_learning_cost.pdf |
_version_ |
1770571470103117824 |