Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance

In property rights theory, firm is an organizational response to reduce transaction cost associated with hold-up of using market mechanism. We claim that strategic alliance { without changing firm boundaries or asset ownership { is another type of organizational response. We construct a model to inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHANG, Juyuan, ZHANG, Yi
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1468
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2467/viewcontent/fixed_learning_cost.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2467
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-24672019-05-20T07:49:26Z Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance ZHANG, Juyuan ZHANG, Yi In property rights theory, firm is an organizational response to reduce transaction cost associated with hold-up of using market mechanism. We claim that strategic alliance { without changing firm boundaries or asset ownership { is another type of organizational response. We construct a model to investigate individual firms' strategic choice on specialization or diversification when producing intermediate products and their further choice of organizational form: autarchy or forming strategic alliance. We introduce fixed learning costs as an indicator of scales of economy and show that only if fixed learning costs are large enough, will firms have incentive to be specialization and form strategic alliance. We distinguish between asymmetric strategic alliance and symmetric strategic alliance and show that transaction cost is not monotonic with respect to fixed learning costs. In particular, for asymmetric strategic alliance, there exists overinvestment with un-utilized capacity. Further, asymmetric strategic alliance is always unstable, while symmetric strategic alliance is stable only if fixed learning costs are large enough. The firm who is entitled with higher learning cost gets higher payout { rewards for the endeavor. If firms are more patient, they are less likely to form strategic alliance. 2008-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1468 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2467/viewcontent/fixed_learning_cost.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Endogenous Transaction Cost Hold-up Specialization Overinvestment Strategic Alliance Industrial Organization
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Endogenous Transaction Cost
Hold-up
Specialization
Overinvestment
Strategic Alliance
Industrial Organization
spellingShingle Endogenous Transaction Cost
Hold-up
Specialization
Overinvestment
Strategic Alliance
Industrial Organization
ZHANG, Juyuan
ZHANG, Yi
Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance
description In property rights theory, firm is an organizational response to reduce transaction cost associated with hold-up of using market mechanism. We claim that strategic alliance { without changing firm boundaries or asset ownership { is another type of organizational response. We construct a model to investigate individual firms' strategic choice on specialization or diversification when producing intermediate products and their further choice of organizational form: autarchy or forming strategic alliance. We introduce fixed learning costs as an indicator of scales of economy and show that only if fixed learning costs are large enough, will firms have incentive to be specialization and form strategic alliance. We distinguish between asymmetric strategic alliance and symmetric strategic alliance and show that transaction cost is not monotonic with respect to fixed learning costs. In particular, for asymmetric strategic alliance, there exists overinvestment with un-utilized capacity. Further, asymmetric strategic alliance is always unstable, while symmetric strategic alliance is stable only if fixed learning costs are large enough. The firm who is entitled with higher learning cost gets higher payout { rewards for the endeavor. If firms are more patient, they are less likely to form strategic alliance.
format text
author ZHANG, Juyuan
ZHANG, Yi
author_facet ZHANG, Juyuan
ZHANG, Yi
author_sort ZHANG, Juyuan
title Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance
title_short Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance
title_full Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance
title_fullStr Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance
title_full_unstemmed Endogenous Transaction Cost, Specialization, and Strategic Alliance
title_sort endogenous transaction cost, specialization, and strategic alliance
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2008
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1468
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2467/viewcontent/fixed_learning_cost.pdf
_version_ 1770571470103117824