Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004

This paper provides a quantitative analysis of gains from trade for China over the period of 1995-2004, which was when China's openness drastically improved. We decompose gains from trade in two ways. First, we disentangle pro-competitive effects from a traditional Ricardian effect. Second, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen-Tai HSU, LU, Yi, WU, Guiying Laura
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1778
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2777/viewcontent/HsuLuWu_201605.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2777
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-27772019-04-19T02:13:33Z Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004 Wen-Tai HSU, LU, Yi WU, Guiying Laura This paper provides a quantitative analysis of gains from trade for China over the period of 1995-2004, which was when China's openness drastically improved. We decompose gains from trade in two ways. First, we disentangle pro-competitive effects from a traditional Ricardian effect. Second, we separate the effect due to tariff reductions from that due to reductions in non-tariff trade costs. Our quantitative analysis shows that the pro-competitive effects account for 25.4% of the total welfare gains from trade, whereas the allocative efficiency alone accounts for 22.3%. We also find that tariff reductions account for about 31.6% of reductions of overall trade costs, whereas the associated relative contribution to overall gains is slightly larger at 39.6%. In our multi-sector analysis, we find that when a sectoral markup is higher in 1995, there tends to be a larger reduction in the respective sectoral trade cost between 1995 and 2004, a tendency that is generally welfare improving. One methodological advantage of this paper's quantitative framework is that its application is not constrained by industrial or product classifications, and so it can be applied to countries of any size. 2015-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1778 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2777/viewcontent/HsuLuWu_201605.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies International Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Asian Studies
International Economics
spellingShingle Asian Studies
International Economics
Wen-Tai HSU,
LU, Yi
WU, Guiying Laura
Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004
description This paper provides a quantitative analysis of gains from trade for China over the period of 1995-2004, which was when China's openness drastically improved. We decompose gains from trade in two ways. First, we disentangle pro-competitive effects from a traditional Ricardian effect. Second, we separate the effect due to tariff reductions from that due to reductions in non-tariff trade costs. Our quantitative analysis shows that the pro-competitive effects account for 25.4% of the total welfare gains from trade, whereas the allocative efficiency alone accounts for 22.3%. We also find that tariff reductions account for about 31.6% of reductions of overall trade costs, whereas the associated relative contribution to overall gains is slightly larger at 39.6%. In our multi-sector analysis, we find that when a sectoral markup is higher in 1995, there tends to be a larger reduction in the respective sectoral trade cost between 1995 and 2004, a tendency that is generally welfare improving. One methodological advantage of this paper's quantitative framework is that its application is not constrained by industrial or product classifications, and so it can be applied to countries of any size.
format text
author Wen-Tai HSU,
LU, Yi
WU, Guiying Laura
author_facet Wen-Tai HSU,
LU, Yi
WU, Guiying Laura
author_sort Wen-Tai HSU,
title Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004
title_short Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004
title_full Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004
title_fullStr Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004
title_full_unstemmed Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004
title_sort competition and gains from trade: a quantitative analysis of china between 1995 and 2004
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1778
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2777/viewcontent/HsuLuWu_201605.pdf
_version_ 1770572648567275520