Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors

This article provides the limit theory of real-time dating algorithms for bubble detection that were suggested in Phillips, Wu, and Yu (PWY; International Economic Review 52 [2011], 201-26) and in a companion paper by the present authors (Phillips, Shi, and Yu, 2015; PSY; International Economic Revi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter C. B. PHILLIPS, SHI, Shuping, Jun YU
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1794
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2793/viewcontent/P_ID_52651_TestingforMultipleBubbles2_LimitTheoryRealTime_pp.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2793
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-27932020-04-02T06:20:34Z Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors Peter C. B. PHILLIPS, SHI, Shuping Jun YU, This article provides the limit theory of real-time dating algorithms for bubble detection that were suggested in Phillips, Wu, and Yu (PWY; International Economic Review 52 [2011], 201-26) and in a companion paper by the present authors (Phillips, Shi, and Yu, 2015; PSY; International Economic Review 56 [2015a], 1099-1134. Bubbles are modeled using mildly explosive bubble episodes that are embedded within longer periods where the data evolve as a stochastic trend, thereby capturing normal market behavior as well as exuberance and collapse. Both the PWY and PSY estimates rely on recursive right-tailed unit root tests (each with a different recursive algorithm) that may be used in real time to locate the origination and collapse dates of bubbles. Under certain explicit conditions, the moving window detector of PSY is shown to be a consistent dating algorithm even in the presence of multiple bubbles. The other algorithms are consistent detectors for bubbles early in the sample and, under stronger conditions, for subsequent bubbles in some cases. These asymptotic results and accompanying simulations guide the practical implementation of the procedures. They indicate that the PSY moving window detector is more reliable than the PWY strategy, sequential application of the PWY procedure, and the CUSUM procedure. 2015-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1794 info:doi/10.1111/iere.12131 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2793/viewcontent/P_ID_52651_TestingforMultipleBubbles2_LimitTheoryRealTime_pp.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Bubble duration Consistency Dating algorithm Limit theory Multiple bubbles Real time detector Econometrics Finance and Financial Management
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Bubble duration
Consistency
Dating algorithm
Limit theory
Multiple bubbles
Real time detector
Econometrics
Finance and Financial Management
spellingShingle Bubble duration
Consistency
Dating algorithm
Limit theory
Multiple bubbles
Real time detector
Econometrics
Finance and Financial Management
Peter C. B. PHILLIPS,
SHI, Shuping
Jun YU,
Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors
description This article provides the limit theory of real-time dating algorithms for bubble detection that were suggested in Phillips, Wu, and Yu (PWY; International Economic Review 52 [2011], 201-26) and in a companion paper by the present authors (Phillips, Shi, and Yu, 2015; PSY; International Economic Review 56 [2015a], 1099-1134. Bubbles are modeled using mildly explosive bubble episodes that are embedded within longer periods where the data evolve as a stochastic trend, thereby capturing normal market behavior as well as exuberance and collapse. Both the PWY and PSY estimates rely on recursive right-tailed unit root tests (each with a different recursive algorithm) that may be used in real time to locate the origination and collapse dates of bubbles. Under certain explicit conditions, the moving window detector of PSY is shown to be a consistent dating algorithm even in the presence of multiple bubbles. The other algorithms are consistent detectors for bubbles early in the sample and, under stronger conditions, for subsequent bubbles in some cases. These asymptotic results and accompanying simulations guide the practical implementation of the procedures. They indicate that the PSY moving window detector is more reliable than the PWY strategy, sequential application of the PWY procedure, and the CUSUM procedure.
format text
author Peter C. B. PHILLIPS,
SHI, Shuping
Jun YU,
author_facet Peter C. B. PHILLIPS,
SHI, Shuping
Jun YU,
author_sort Peter C. B. PHILLIPS,
title Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors
title_short Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors
title_full Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors
title_fullStr Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors
title_full_unstemmed Testing for multiple bubbles: Limit theory of real-time detectors
title_sort testing for multiple bubbles: limit theory of real-time detectors
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1794
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2793/viewcontent/P_ID_52651_TestingforMultipleBubbles2_LimitTheoryRealTime_pp.pdf
_version_ 1770572851053592576