Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion

This paper provides two equivalent representations for thegeneral class of uncertainty averse preferences studied by Cerreia-Vioglio,Maccheroni, Marinacci and Montrucchio (2011). The two representations employrespectively two important extensions of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989)’s maxmindecision rule...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jingyi XUE
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1904
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2903/viewcontent/preferences_with_changing_ambiguity_aversion__revised_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2903
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-29032019-04-20T00:51:17Z Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion Jingyi XUE, This paper provides two equivalent representations for thegeneral class of uncertainty averse preferences studied by Cerreia-Vioglio,Maccheroni, Marinacci and Montrucchio (2011). The two representations employrespectively two important extensions of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989)’s maxmindecision rule. The first is a weighted maxmin representation with anon-constant weight used in mixing the minimum and maximum expected utilities.The second is a variant constraint representation which evaluates a prospect bythe worst expected utility over a neighborhood of approximating priors wherethe size of the neighborhood depends on the prospect. The equivalent representationshave advantage in several respects. In the second part of this paper, we studythe wealth effect under ambiguity. We propose axioms on absolute and relativeuncertainty aversion and derive the three representations for the uncertaintyaverse preferences displaying decreasing (increasing) absolute uncertaintyaversion. The characterization result not only provides a model of relevantbehavior under ambiguity, but also shows how the two alternativerepresentations stand out in presenting the changing patterns of one’suncertainty aversion. 2017-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1904 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2903/viewcontent/preferences_with_changing_ambiguity_aversion__revised_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Ambiguity Uncertainty averse preferences Weighted maxmin representation Variant constraint representation Decreasing absolute uncertainty aversion Increasing relativeUncertainty aversion Wealth effect Economic Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Ambiguity
Uncertainty averse preferences
Weighted maxmin representation
Variant constraint representation
Decreasing absolute uncertainty aversion
Increasing relativeUncertainty aversion
Wealth effect
Economic Theory
spellingShingle Ambiguity
Uncertainty averse preferences
Weighted maxmin representation
Variant constraint representation
Decreasing absolute uncertainty aversion
Increasing relativeUncertainty aversion
Wealth effect
Economic Theory
Jingyi XUE,
Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion
description This paper provides two equivalent representations for thegeneral class of uncertainty averse preferences studied by Cerreia-Vioglio,Maccheroni, Marinacci and Montrucchio (2011). The two representations employrespectively two important extensions of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989)’s maxmindecision rule. The first is a weighted maxmin representation with anon-constant weight used in mixing the minimum and maximum expected utilities.The second is a variant constraint representation which evaluates a prospect bythe worst expected utility over a neighborhood of approximating priors wherethe size of the neighborhood depends on the prospect. The equivalent representationshave advantage in several respects. In the second part of this paper, we studythe wealth effect under ambiguity. We propose axioms on absolute and relativeuncertainty aversion and derive the three representations for the uncertaintyaverse preferences displaying decreasing (increasing) absolute uncertaintyaversion. The characterization result not only provides a model of relevantbehavior under ambiguity, but also shows how the two alternativerepresentations stand out in presenting the changing patterns of one’suncertainty aversion.
format text
author Jingyi XUE,
author_facet Jingyi XUE,
author_sort Jingyi XUE,
title Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion
title_short Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion
title_full Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion
title_fullStr Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion
title_full_unstemmed Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion
title_sort preferences with changing ambiguity aversion
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1904
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2903/viewcontent/preferences_with_changing_ambiguity_aversion__revised_.pdf
_version_ 1770573208079040512