Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies

The ratio of hirings to vacancies in the U.S. has the following establishment level properties: (i) it steeply rises with employment growth rate; (ii) falls with establishment size; and (iii) rises with worker turnover rate. The standard Diamond-Mortensen Pissarides (DMP) matching model is not compa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: BAYDUR, Ismail
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1990
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2989/viewcontent/workerselection.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-2989
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-29892021-03-12T07:11:03Z Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies BAYDUR, Ismail The ratio of hirings to vacancies in the U.S. has the following establishment level properties: (i) it steeply rises with employment growth rate; (ii) falls with establishment size; and (iii) rises with worker turnover rate. The standard Diamond-Mortensen Pissarides (DMP) matching model is not compatible with these observations. This paper augments selection of workers prior to hiring into a random matching model with multi-worker firms. In the calibrated model, worker selection accounts for about 30% of the variation in the hiring-vacancy ratio observed in the data. Compared to the standard model, the worker selection model has both qualitative and quantitative policy implications. A hiring subsidy reduces the unemployment rate substantially in the worker selection model, whereas the reduction in the unemployment rate is very small in the standard model. The two models also differ regarding the impact of the hiring subsidy across firms. The worker selection model implies that firms that have initially high worker turnover rates experience proportionally higher worker turnover rates after the subsidy. In contrast, the standard model predicts that the worker turnover rate increases proportionally more at firms with initially lower worker turnover rates. 2017-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1990 info:doi/10.1257/mac.20140260 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2989/viewcontent/workerselection.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University equilibrium unemployment cyclical behavior labor-market turnover costs firm dynamics search efficiency wages size Labor Economics Macroeconomics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic equilibrium unemployment
cyclical behavior
labor-market
turnover costs
firm dynamics
search
efficiency
wages
size
Labor Economics
Macroeconomics
spellingShingle equilibrium unemployment
cyclical behavior
labor-market
turnover costs
firm dynamics
search
efficiency
wages
size
Labor Economics
Macroeconomics
BAYDUR, Ismail
Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies
description The ratio of hirings to vacancies in the U.S. has the following establishment level properties: (i) it steeply rises with employment growth rate; (ii) falls with establishment size; and (iii) rises with worker turnover rate. The standard Diamond-Mortensen Pissarides (DMP) matching model is not compatible with these observations. This paper augments selection of workers prior to hiring into a random matching model with multi-worker firms. In the calibrated model, worker selection accounts for about 30% of the variation in the hiring-vacancy ratio observed in the data. Compared to the standard model, the worker selection model has both qualitative and quantitative policy implications. A hiring subsidy reduces the unemployment rate substantially in the worker selection model, whereas the reduction in the unemployment rate is very small in the standard model. The two models also differ regarding the impact of the hiring subsidy across firms. The worker selection model implies that firms that have initially high worker turnover rates experience proportionally higher worker turnover rates after the subsidy. In contrast, the standard model predicts that the worker turnover rate increases proportionally more at firms with initially lower worker turnover rates.
format text
author BAYDUR, Ismail
author_facet BAYDUR, Ismail
author_sort BAYDUR, Ismail
title Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies
title_short Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies
title_full Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies
title_fullStr Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies
title_full_unstemmed Worker selection, hiring, and vacancies
title_sort worker selection, hiring, and vacancies
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1990
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/2989/viewcontent/workerselection.pdf
_version_ 1770573490905153536