Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004

This paper provides a quantitative analysis of gains from trade in a model with head-to-head competition using Chinese firm-level data from Economic Censuses in 1995 and 2004. We find a significant reduction in trade cost during this period, and total gains from such improved openness during this pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HSU, Wen-Tai, LU, Yi, WU, Guiying Laura
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2078
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3077/viewcontent/wto_entry_011019_with_tables_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3077
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-30772019-04-19T15:40:30Z Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004 HSU, Wen-Tai LU, Yi WU, Guiying Laura This paper provides a quantitative analysis of gains from trade in a model with head-to-head competition using Chinese firm-level data from Economic Censuses in 1995 and 2004. We find a significant reduction in trade cost during this period, and total gains from such improved openness during this period is 7:1%. The gains are decomposed into a Ricardian component and two pro-competitive ones. The procompetitive effects account for 20% of the total gains. Moreover, the total gains from trade are 13 31% larger than what would result from the formula provided by ACR (Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodríguez-Clare 2012), which nests a class of important trade models, but without pro-competitive effects. We find that head-to-head competition is the key reason behind the larger gains, as trade flows do not reflect all of the effects via markups in an event of trade liberalization. One methodological advantage of this paper’s quantitative framework is that its application is not constrained by industrial or product classifications; thus it can be applied to countries of any size. 2019-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2078 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3077/viewcontent/wto_entry_011019_with_tables_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Gains from trade Markups Pro-competitive effects ACR formula Head-to-head competition Chinese economy Asian Studies Industrial Organization International Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Gains from trade
Markups
Pro-competitive effects
ACR formula
Head-to-head competition
Chinese economy
Asian Studies
Industrial Organization
International Economics
spellingShingle Gains from trade
Markups
Pro-competitive effects
ACR formula
Head-to-head competition
Chinese economy
Asian Studies
Industrial Organization
International Economics
HSU, Wen-Tai
LU, Yi
WU, Guiying Laura
Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004
description This paper provides a quantitative analysis of gains from trade in a model with head-to-head competition using Chinese firm-level data from Economic Censuses in 1995 and 2004. We find a significant reduction in trade cost during this period, and total gains from such improved openness during this period is 7:1%. The gains are decomposed into a Ricardian component and two pro-competitive ones. The procompetitive effects account for 20% of the total gains. Moreover, the total gains from trade are 13 31% larger than what would result from the formula provided by ACR (Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodríguez-Clare 2012), which nests a class of important trade models, but without pro-competitive effects. We find that head-to-head competition is the key reason behind the larger gains, as trade flows do not reflect all of the effects via markups in an event of trade liberalization. One methodological advantage of this paper’s quantitative framework is that its application is not constrained by industrial or product classifications; thus it can be applied to countries of any size.
format text
author HSU, Wen-Tai
LU, Yi
WU, Guiying Laura
author_facet HSU, Wen-Tai
LU, Yi
WU, Guiying Laura
author_sort HSU, Wen-Tai
title Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004
title_short Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004
title_full Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004
title_fullStr Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004
title_full_unstemmed Competition, markups, and gains from trade: A quantitative analysis of China between 1995 and 2004
title_sort competition, markups, and gains from trade: a quantitative analysis of china between 1995 and 2004
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2078
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3077/viewcontent/wto_entry_011019_with_tables_.pdf
_version_ 1770573651630882816