Specification tests based on MCMC output

Two test statistics are proposed to determine model specification after a model is estimated by an MCMC method. The first test is the MCMC version of IOSA test and its asymptotic null distribution is normal. The second test is motivated from the power enhancement technique of Fan et al. (2015). It c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LI, Yong, YU, Jun, ZENG, Tao
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2220
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3219/viewcontent/Specification_Test_MCMC_Output_2018_July.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3219
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-32192021-06-25T02:20:33Z Specification tests based on MCMC output LI, Yong YU, Jun ZENG, Tao Two test statistics are proposed to determine model specification after a model is estimated by an MCMC method. The first test is the MCMC version of IOSA test and its asymptotic null distribution is normal. The second test is motivated from the power enhancement technique of Fan et al. (2015). It combines a component (J1) that tests a null point hypothesis in an expanded model and a power enhancement component (J0) obtained from the first test. It is shown that J0 converges to zero when the null model is correctly specified and diverges when the null model is misspecified. Also shown is that J1 is asymptotically χ2 -distributed, suggesting that the second test is asymptotically pivotal, when the null model is correctly specified. The main feature of the first test is that no alternative model is needed. The second test has several properties. First, its size distortion is small and hence bootstrap methods can be avoided. Second, it is easy to compute from MCMC output and hence is applicable to a wide range of models, including latent variable models for which frequentist methods are difficult to use. Third, when the test statistic rejects the null model and J1 takes a large value, the test suggests the source of misspecification. The finite sample performance is investigated using simulated data. The method is illustrated in a linear regression model, a linear state-space model, and a stochastic volatility model using real data. 2018-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2220 info:doi/10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.08.001 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3219/viewcontent/Specification_Test_MCMC_Output_2018_July.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Specification test Point hypothesis test Latent variable models Markov chain Monte Carlo Power enhancement technique Information matrix Econometrics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Specification test
Point hypothesis test
Latent variable models
Markov chain Monte Carlo
Power enhancement technique
Information matrix
Econometrics
spellingShingle Specification test
Point hypothesis test
Latent variable models
Markov chain Monte Carlo
Power enhancement technique
Information matrix
Econometrics
LI, Yong
YU, Jun
ZENG, Tao
Specification tests based on MCMC output
description Two test statistics are proposed to determine model specification after a model is estimated by an MCMC method. The first test is the MCMC version of IOSA test and its asymptotic null distribution is normal. The second test is motivated from the power enhancement technique of Fan et al. (2015). It combines a component (J1) that tests a null point hypothesis in an expanded model and a power enhancement component (J0) obtained from the first test. It is shown that J0 converges to zero when the null model is correctly specified and diverges when the null model is misspecified. Also shown is that J1 is asymptotically χ2 -distributed, suggesting that the second test is asymptotically pivotal, when the null model is correctly specified. The main feature of the first test is that no alternative model is needed. The second test has several properties. First, its size distortion is small and hence bootstrap methods can be avoided. Second, it is easy to compute from MCMC output and hence is applicable to a wide range of models, including latent variable models for which frequentist methods are difficult to use. Third, when the test statistic rejects the null model and J1 takes a large value, the test suggests the source of misspecification. The finite sample performance is investigated using simulated data. The method is illustrated in a linear regression model, a linear state-space model, and a stochastic volatility model using real data.
format text
author LI, Yong
YU, Jun
ZENG, Tao
author_facet LI, Yong
YU, Jun
ZENG, Tao
author_sort LI, Yong
title Specification tests based on MCMC output
title_short Specification tests based on MCMC output
title_full Specification tests based on MCMC output
title_fullStr Specification tests based on MCMC output
title_full_unstemmed Specification tests based on MCMC output
title_sort specification tests based on mcmc output
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2220
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3219/viewcontent/Specification_Test_MCMC_Output_2018_July.pdf
_version_ 1770574432693125120