Fair division with uncertain needs

Imagine agents having uncertain needs for a resource when the resource has to be divided before uncertainty resolves. In this situation, waste occurs when an agent's assignment turns out to exceed his realized need. How should the resource be divided in the face of possible waste? This is a que...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: XUE, Jingyi
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2236
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3235/viewcontent/Fair_Division_with_Uncertain_Needs_pp.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3235
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-32352019-01-22T08:07:51Z Fair division with uncertain needs XUE, Jingyi Imagine agents having uncertain needs for a resource when the resource has to be divided before uncertainty resolves. In this situation, waste occurs when an agent's assignment turns out to exceed his realized need. How should the resource be divided in the face of possible waste? This is a question out of the scope of the existing rationing literature. Our main axiom to address the issue is no domination. It requires that no agent receive more of the resource than another while producing a larger expected waste, unless the other agent has been fully compensated. Together with conditional strict endowment monotonicity, consistency, and strong upper composition, a class of rules which we call expected-waste constrained uniform gains rules is characterized. Any such rule is associated with a function that aggregates the two types of cost generated by an agent at an allocation: the amount of the resource assigned to him and the expected waste he generates. The rule selects the allocation that equalizes as much as possible the cost generated by each agent. The subclasses of rules associated with homothetic and linear cost functions are also characterized. Lastly, to appreciate the role of no domination, we establish all the characterizations with a decomposition of no domination into two axioms: risk aversion and no reversal. They respectively capture the ideas that a rule should not be unresponsive to uncertainty, and that neither should it be overly responsive to it. 2018-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2236 info:doi/10.1007/s00355-018-1109-5 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3235/viewcontent/Fair_Division_with_Uncertain_Needs_pp.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Economic Theory Social Welfare
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Economic Theory
Social Welfare
spellingShingle Economic Theory
Social Welfare
XUE, Jingyi
Fair division with uncertain needs
description Imagine agents having uncertain needs for a resource when the resource has to be divided before uncertainty resolves. In this situation, waste occurs when an agent's assignment turns out to exceed his realized need. How should the resource be divided in the face of possible waste? This is a question out of the scope of the existing rationing literature. Our main axiom to address the issue is no domination. It requires that no agent receive more of the resource than another while producing a larger expected waste, unless the other agent has been fully compensated. Together with conditional strict endowment monotonicity, consistency, and strong upper composition, a class of rules which we call expected-waste constrained uniform gains rules is characterized. Any such rule is associated with a function that aggregates the two types of cost generated by an agent at an allocation: the amount of the resource assigned to him and the expected waste he generates. The rule selects the allocation that equalizes as much as possible the cost generated by each agent. The subclasses of rules associated with homothetic and linear cost functions are also characterized. Lastly, to appreciate the role of no domination, we establish all the characterizations with a decomposition of no domination into two axioms: risk aversion and no reversal. They respectively capture the ideas that a rule should not be unresponsive to uncertainty, and that neither should it be overly responsive to it.
format text
author XUE, Jingyi
author_facet XUE, Jingyi
author_sort XUE, Jingyi
title Fair division with uncertain needs
title_short Fair division with uncertain needs
title_full Fair division with uncertain needs
title_fullStr Fair division with uncertain needs
title_full_unstemmed Fair division with uncertain needs
title_sort fair division with uncertain needs
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2236
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3235/viewcontent/Fair_Division_with_Uncertain_Needs_pp.pdf
_version_ 1770574508718030848