Evaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstracts
We study whether humans or machine learning (ML) classification models are better at classifying scientific research abstracts according to a fixed set of discipline groups. We recruit both undergraduate and postgraduate assistants for this task in separate stages, and compare their performance agai...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | GOH, Yeow Chong, CAI, Xin Qing, THESEIRA, Walter, KO, Giovanni, KHOR, Khiam Aik |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2446 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3445/viewcontent/Goh2020_Article_EvaluatingHumanVersusMachineLe.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Evaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstracts
by: Goh, Yeow Chong, et al.
Published: (2021) -
CenKNN: A scalable and effective text classifier
by: PANG, Guansong, et al.
Published: (2014) -
What makes categories difficult to classify?
by: SUN, Aixin, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Bayesian online classifiers for text classification and filtering
by: Chai, K.M.A., et al.
Published: (2013) -
Incorporating linguistically motivated knowledge sources into document classification
by: GOH JIE MEIN
Published: (2010)