Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare

This paper estimates the effects of time-varying consumer preference bias on trade flows and welfare. We use a unique data set from the BBC World Service Poll, which surveys (annually during 2005–2017 with some gaps) the populations of a wide array of countries on their views of whether an evaluated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHANG, Pao-Li, FUJII, Tomoki, JIN, Wei
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2517
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3516/viewcontent/pipa_paper.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_research-3516
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_research-35162022-11-22T01:35:16Z Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare CHANG, Pao-Li FUJII, Tomoki JIN, Wei This paper estimates the effects of time-varying consumer preference bias on trade flows and welfare. We use a unique data set from the BBC World Service Poll, which surveys (annually during 2005–2017 with some gaps) the populations of a wide array of countries on their views of whether an evaluated country is having a mainly positive or negative influence in the world. We identify the effects on consumer preference parameters due to shifts in these country image perceptions and quantify their general equilibrium effects on bilateral exports and welfare (each time for an evaluated exporting country, holding the exporting country’s own preference parameters constant). We consider five important shifts in country image: the George W. Bush effect, the Donald Trump effect, the Senkaku Islands Dispute effect, the Brexit effect, and the Good-Boy Canadian effect. We find that such changes in bilateral country image perceptions have quantitatively important trade and welfare effects. The negative impact of Donald Trump’s “America First” campaign rhetoric on the U.S.’s country image might have cost the United States 4%–5% of its total exports and welfare gains from trade. In contrast, the consistent improvement of Canada’s country image between 2010 and 2017 has amounted to more than 8% of its total welfare gains from trade. 2022-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2517 info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4250 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3516/viewcontent/pipa_paper.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Economics eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Country Image Consumer Preferences Trade Flows Quantitative Welfare Analysis International Economics Public Economics Social Welfare
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Country Image
Consumer Preferences
Trade Flows
Quantitative Welfare Analysis
International Economics
Public Economics
Social Welfare
spellingShingle Country Image
Consumer Preferences
Trade Flows
Quantitative Welfare Analysis
International Economics
Public Economics
Social Welfare
CHANG, Pao-Li
FUJII, Tomoki
JIN, Wei
Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare
description This paper estimates the effects of time-varying consumer preference bias on trade flows and welfare. We use a unique data set from the BBC World Service Poll, which surveys (annually during 2005–2017 with some gaps) the populations of a wide array of countries on their views of whether an evaluated country is having a mainly positive or negative influence in the world. We identify the effects on consumer preference parameters due to shifts in these country image perceptions and quantify their general equilibrium effects on bilateral exports and welfare (each time for an evaluated exporting country, holding the exporting country’s own preference parameters constant). We consider five important shifts in country image: the George W. Bush effect, the Donald Trump effect, the Senkaku Islands Dispute effect, the Brexit effect, and the Good-Boy Canadian effect. We find that such changes in bilateral country image perceptions have quantitatively important trade and welfare effects. The negative impact of Donald Trump’s “America First” campaign rhetoric on the U.S.’s country image might have cost the United States 4%–5% of its total exports and welfare gains from trade. In contrast, the consistent improvement of Canada’s country image between 2010 and 2017 has amounted to more than 8% of its total welfare gains from trade.
format text
author CHANG, Pao-Li
FUJII, Tomoki
JIN, Wei
author_facet CHANG, Pao-Li
FUJII, Tomoki
JIN, Wei
author_sort CHANG, Pao-Li
title Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare
title_short Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare
title_full Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare
title_fullStr Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare
title_full_unstemmed Good names beget favors: The impact of country image on trade flows and welfare
title_sort good names beget favors: the impact of country image on trade flows and welfare
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2517
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3516/viewcontent/pipa_paper.pdf
_version_ 1770576037702270976