What, why and how financial development matters: Evidence of ASEAN-5, Asia-5 and OECD-7 Economies
This paper analysed the association between bank and capital markets financial development with income per capita in three regions; ASEAN-5 economies (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia), Asia-5 (Japan, China, Hong Kong SAR, South Korea and India) and OECD-7 (Australia, Canada, De...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2643 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soe_research/article/3642/viewcontent/1._What__Why_and_How_Financial_Development_Matters.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | This paper analysed the association between bank and capital markets financial development with income per capita in three regions; ASEAN-5 economies (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia), Asia-5 (Japan, China, Hong Kong SAR, South Korea and India) and OECD-7 (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, UK and US) covering the period from 2000 to 2017 using panel data analysis. Fixed effect regression models with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors to account for the problem of heteroskedastic and autocorrelated error structure are used. What ASEAN-5 can learn from Asia-5 and OECD-7 experience is that bank size does matter for Asia-5 and OECD-7 despite digital disruptions to their banking systems; yet financial structure that favours banks is negatively associated with income per capita for Asia-5, and importantly, efficient banking system (not bank size alone) drives OECD-7 income per capita. The finding has practical policy implications for a ASEAN-5’s financial sector liberalization programmes that impact the depth, breadth and efficiency of banks and capital markets. |
|---|