Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness

The log realized volatility of financial assets is often modeled as an autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average model (ARFIMA) process, denoted by ARFIMA(p, d, q), with p = 1 and q = 0. Two conflicting results have been found in the literature regarding the dynamics. One stream shows th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SHI, Shuping, YU, Jun
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_working_paper/5
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=soe_working_paper
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soe_working_paper-1006
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soe_working_paper-10062021-08-30T01:03:11Z Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness SHI, Shuping YU, Jun The log realized volatility of financial assets is often modeled as an autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average model (ARFIMA) process, denoted by ARFIMA(p, d, q), with p = 1 and q = 0. Two conflicting results have been found in the literature regarding the dynamics. One stream shows that the data series has a long memory (i.e., the fractional parameter d > 0) with strong mean reversion (i.e., the autoregressive coefficient |α1| ≈ 0). The other stream suggests that the volatil-ity is rough (i.e., d < 0) with highly persistent dynamic (i.e., α1 → 1). To consolidate the findings, this paper first examines the finite sample properties of alternative estimation methods employed in the literature for the ARFIMA(1, d, 0) model and then applies the outperforming techniques to a wide range of financial assets. The candidate methods include two parametric maximum likeli-hood (ML) methods (the maximum time-domain modified profile likelihood (MPL) and maximum frequency-domain likelihood) and two semiparametric methods (the local Whittle method and log periodogram estimation method). The two parametric methods work well across all parameter set-tings, with the MPL method outperforming. In contrast, the two semiparametric methods have a very large upward bias for d and an equally large downward bias for α1 when α1 is close to unity. The poor performance of the semiparametric methods in the presence of a highly persistent dynamic might lead to a false conclusion of long memory. In the empirical applications, we find that the log realized volatilities of exchange rate futures over the past decade have a long memory, where the point estimate of d is between 0.4 and 0.5 and the estimate of α1 is near zero. For other finan-cial assets considered (including stock indices and industry indices), we find that they have rough volatility, with the point estimate of d being negative and the point estimates of α1 close to unity. 2021-08-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_working_paper/5 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&amp;context=soe_working_paper http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ SMU Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Long memory fractional integration roughness short-run dynamics realized volatility Econometrics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Long memory
fractional integration
roughness
short-run dynamics
realized volatility
Econometrics
spellingShingle Long memory
fractional integration
roughness
short-run dynamics
realized volatility
Econometrics
SHI, Shuping
YU, Jun
Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness
description The log realized volatility of financial assets is often modeled as an autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average model (ARFIMA) process, denoted by ARFIMA(p, d, q), with p = 1 and q = 0. Two conflicting results have been found in the literature regarding the dynamics. One stream shows that the data series has a long memory (i.e., the fractional parameter d > 0) with strong mean reversion (i.e., the autoregressive coefficient |α1| ≈ 0). The other stream suggests that the volatil-ity is rough (i.e., d < 0) with highly persistent dynamic (i.e., α1 → 1). To consolidate the findings, this paper first examines the finite sample properties of alternative estimation methods employed in the literature for the ARFIMA(1, d, 0) model and then applies the outperforming techniques to a wide range of financial assets. The candidate methods include two parametric maximum likeli-hood (ML) methods (the maximum time-domain modified profile likelihood (MPL) and maximum frequency-domain likelihood) and two semiparametric methods (the local Whittle method and log periodogram estimation method). The two parametric methods work well across all parameter set-tings, with the MPL method outperforming. In contrast, the two semiparametric methods have a very large upward bias for d and an equally large downward bias for α1 when α1 is close to unity. The poor performance of the semiparametric methods in the presence of a highly persistent dynamic might lead to a false conclusion of long memory. In the empirical applications, we find that the log realized volatilities of exchange rate futures over the past decade have a long memory, where the point estimate of d is between 0.4 and 0.5 and the estimate of α1 is near zero. For other finan-cial assets considered (including stock indices and industry indices), we find that they have rough volatility, with the point estimate of d being negative and the point estimates of α1 close to unity.
format text
author SHI, Shuping
YU, Jun
author_facet SHI, Shuping
YU, Jun
author_sort SHI, Shuping
title Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness
title_short Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness
title_full Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness
title_fullStr Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness
title_full_unstemmed Different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness
title_sort different strokes for different folks: long memory and roughness
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_working_paper/5
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&amp;context=soe_working_paper
_version_ 1712301954844065792