Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?

At the very heart of every political democracy is the right of citizens to participate in its democratic processes. The right to vote is the bedrock of a democratic polity and the essence of representative governance. No right is more precious than the right to have a voice in the election of those...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DAM, Shubhankar
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/481
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-1480
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-14802010-09-21T08:36:04Z Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute? DAM, Shubhankar At the very heart of every political democracy is the right of citizens to participate in its democratic processes. The right to vote is the bedrock of a democratic polity and the essence of representative governance. No right is more precious than the right to have a voice in the election of those who make laws that govern us. All other rights, even the most basic, are illusory without a meaningful right to vote. While democracy is not synonymous with the right to vote, it is undeniable that there is little left of it when the right to vote itself is taken away. For “at the bottom of all tributes”, to borrow the matchless words of Sir Winston Churchill, “is the little man, walking into a little booth, with a little pencil, making a little cross on a little bit of paper--no amount of rhetoric or voluminous discussion can possibly diminish the overwhelming importance of the point”. This note is an analysis of the status of the right to vote under the Indian Constitution. The debate on the status of right to vote in India was presented with a novel dimension in the opinion of the Judge P.V. Reddi who in the recent case of Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India observed that the right to vote has its roots in the Indian Constitution and, therefore, is a constitutional right. Strange as it may seem to readers from other constitutional jurisdictions, this was the first occasion that such a judicial opinion has been expressed. For nearly five decades, the Indian Supreme Court had consistently held the view that the right to vote in India was a statutory right “pure and simple”. 2004-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/481 Research Collection School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Constitutional rights Democracy India Right to vote Asian Studies Public Law and Legal Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Constitutional rights
Democracy
India
Right to vote
Asian Studies
Public Law and Legal Theory
spellingShingle Constitutional rights
Democracy
India
Right to vote
Asian Studies
Public Law and Legal Theory
DAM, Shubhankar
Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?
description At the very heart of every political democracy is the right of citizens to participate in its democratic processes. The right to vote is the bedrock of a democratic polity and the essence of representative governance. No right is more precious than the right to have a voice in the election of those who make laws that govern us. All other rights, even the most basic, are illusory without a meaningful right to vote. While democracy is not synonymous with the right to vote, it is undeniable that there is little left of it when the right to vote itself is taken away. For “at the bottom of all tributes”, to borrow the matchless words of Sir Winston Churchill, “is the little man, walking into a little booth, with a little pencil, making a little cross on a little bit of paper--no amount of rhetoric or voluminous discussion can possibly diminish the overwhelming importance of the point”. This note is an analysis of the status of the right to vote under the Indian Constitution. The debate on the status of right to vote in India was presented with a novel dimension in the opinion of the Judge P.V. Reddi who in the recent case of Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India observed that the right to vote has its roots in the Indian Constitution and, therefore, is a constitutional right. Strange as it may seem to readers from other constitutional jurisdictions, this was the first occasion that such a judicial opinion has been expressed. For nearly five decades, the Indian Supreme Court had consistently held the view that the right to vote in India was a statutory right “pure and simple”.
format text
author DAM, Shubhankar
author_facet DAM, Shubhankar
author_sort DAM, Shubhankar
title Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?
title_short Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?
title_full Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?
title_fullStr Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?
title_full_unstemmed Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?
title_sort peoples union for civil liberties v union of india: is indian democracy dependent on a statute?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2004
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/481
_version_ 1712302190646788096