Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore
On 16 November 2004, the Singapore Parliament passed the Copyright (Amendment) Act (Act 52 of 2004) to amend the Copyright Act 1987 (the 'Act').1 These amendments, being the most extensive since the Act was last revised in 1999 and passed pursuant to Singapore’s obligations under the IP Ch...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eam005 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-1753 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-17532010-09-21T08:36:04Z Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore SAW, Cheng Lim KOH, Winston T. H. On 16 November 2004, the Singapore Parliament passed the Copyright (Amendment) Act (Act 52 of 2004) to amend the Copyright Act 1987 (the 'Act').1 These amendments, being the most extensive since the Act was last revised in 1999 and passed pursuant to Singapore’s obligations under the IP Chapter of the United States – Singapore Free Trade Agreement ('USSFTA'), came into force in Singapore on 1 January 2005. Not long before this, Parliament had already amended the Act by increasing the term of protection for authors' works to life plus 70 years (up from 50 years) and for sound recordings, cinematograph films and live performances for a further 20 years (also up from 50 years). However, a second wave of legislative amendments was necessary to update our copyright laws in light of rapid advancements in computer, digital and Internet technologies as well as to align them further with those of the US (in particular). It therefore comes as no surprise that we now discover in Singapore's newly-amended copyright legislation the introduction of, inter alia, anti-circumvention provisions (modelled on those in the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998), stronger protection for Rights Management Information, a new exclusive right of communication to the public, a generic fair dealing defence as well as a more detailed 'safe harbour' regime for network service providers. 2005-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/754 info:doi/10.1093/ijlit/eai020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eam005 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Intellectual Property Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Asian Studies Intellectual Property Law |
spellingShingle |
Asian Studies Intellectual Property Law SAW, Cheng Lim KOH, Winston T. H. Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore |
description |
On 16 November 2004, the Singapore Parliament passed the Copyright (Amendment) Act (Act 52 of 2004) to amend the Copyright Act 1987 (the 'Act').1 These amendments, being the most extensive since the Act was last revised in 1999 and passed pursuant to Singapore’s obligations under the IP Chapter of the United States – Singapore Free Trade Agreement ('USSFTA'), came into force in Singapore on 1 January 2005. Not long before this, Parliament had already amended the Act by increasing the term of protection for authors' works to life plus 70 years (up from 50 years) and for sound recordings, cinematograph films and live performances for a further 20 years (also up from 50 years). However, a second wave of legislative amendments was necessary to update our copyright laws in light of rapid advancements in computer, digital and Internet technologies as well as to align them further with those of the US (in particular). It therefore comes as no surprise that we now discover in Singapore's newly-amended copyright legislation the introduction of, inter alia, anti-circumvention provisions (modelled on those in the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998), stronger protection for Rights Management Information, a new exclusive right of communication to the public, a generic fair dealing defence as well as a more detailed 'safe harbour' regime for network service providers. |
format |
text |
author |
SAW, Cheng Lim KOH, Winston T. H. |
author_facet |
SAW, Cheng Lim KOH, Winston T. H. |
author_sort |
SAW, Cheng Lim |
title |
Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore |
title_short |
Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore |
title_full |
Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore |
title_fullStr |
Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does P2P have a future? Perspectives from Singapore |
title_sort |
does p2p have a future? perspectives from singapore |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eam005 |
_version_ |
1772829773328809984 |