Notes of Cases: Contract Frustrated - Then Performed!
The Suez incident continues to provide materials for the illumination of the doctrine of frustration. In Sciete Franco Tunisienne D'Armement v. Sidermar S.P.A. Pearson J. had to consider its effect upon a charterparty dated October 18, 1956, by which the plaintiff's ship, the Massalia, was...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1961
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1005 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1093052 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | The Suez incident continues to provide materials for the illumination of the doctrine of frustration. In Sciete Franco Tunisienne D'Armement v. Sidermar S.P.A. Pearson J. had to consider its effect upon a charterparty dated October 18, 1956, by which the plaintiff's ship, the Massalia, was chartered to proceed "with all convenient speed" to Masulipatha and there load a cargo of iron ore to be carried with "with all convenient speed" to Genoa. |
|---|