The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email

The ‘traditional’ classi?cation into ‘instantaneous’ and ‘non-instantaneous’ methods of communication must be abandoned. As all Internet transmissions are instantaneous, the choice between the principle of receipt and the postal exception must be based on other criteria. The focus must be shifted fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MIK, Eliza
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1054
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3006/viewcontent/1THEEFFECTIVENESSOFACCEPTANCESCOMMUNICATEDBYELECTRONICMEANS_NT.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3006
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-30062016-04-11T06:50:38Z The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email MIK, Eliza The ‘traditional’ classi?cation into ‘instantaneous’ and ‘non-instantaneous’ methods of communication must be abandoned. As all Internet transmissions are instantaneous, the choice between the principle of receipt and the postal exception must be based on other criteria. The focus must be shifted from communication devices to the characteristics of the communication process. The latter resembles either dealings face-to-face or dealings at a distance. This simple division should remain the basis for all analyses. Instantaneity and control are two of many characteristics of face-to-face dealings and are not the only factors to be taken into account when making the choice between the principle and the postal exception. The focus must be shifted from the speed of transmission and the control of the communication process to the question whether the communication process is interactive and real-time. If the interaction resembles face-to-face dealings, the application of the principle is unquestionable. The postal acceptance rule can only be debated if the interaction does not resemble face-to-face dealings and one of the parties deserves protection from the risks of the communication method chosen by the other. 2009-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1054 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3006/viewcontent/1THEEFFECTIVENESSOFACCEPTANCESCOMMUNICATEDBYELECTRONICMEANS_NT.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University contract law e-commerce online contracting Contracts Internet Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic contract law
e-commerce
online contracting
Contracts
Internet Law
spellingShingle contract law
e-commerce
online contracting
Contracts
Internet Law
MIK, Eliza
The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email
description The ‘traditional’ classi?cation into ‘instantaneous’ and ‘non-instantaneous’ methods of communication must be abandoned. As all Internet transmissions are instantaneous, the choice between the principle of receipt and the postal exception must be based on other criteria. The focus must be shifted from communication devices to the characteristics of the communication process. The latter resembles either dealings face-to-face or dealings at a distance. This simple division should remain the basis for all analyses. Instantaneity and control are two of many characteristics of face-to-face dealings and are not the only factors to be taken into account when making the choice between the principle and the postal exception. The focus must be shifted from the speed of transmission and the control of the communication process to the question whether the communication process is interactive and real-time. If the interaction resembles face-to-face dealings, the application of the principle is unquestionable. The postal acceptance rule can only be debated if the interaction does not resemble face-to-face dealings and one of the parties deserves protection from the risks of the communication method chosen by the other.
format text
author MIK, Eliza
author_facet MIK, Eliza
author_sort MIK, Eliza
title The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email
title_short The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email
title_full The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email
title_sort effectiveness of acceptances communicated by electronic means, or – does the postal acceptance rule apply to email
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1054
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3006/viewcontent/1THEEFFECTIVENESSOFACCEPTANCESCOMMUNICATEDBYELECTRONICMEANS_NT.pdf
_version_ 1772829656096964608