The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email
The ‘traditional’ classi?cation into ‘instantaneous’ and ‘non-instantaneous’ methods of communication must be abandoned. As all Internet transmissions are instantaneous, the choice between the principle of receipt and the postal exception must be based on other criteria. The focus must be shifted fr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1054 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3006/viewcontent/1THEEFFECTIVENESSOFACCEPTANCESCOMMUNICATEDBYELECTRONICMEANS_NT.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3006 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-30062016-04-11T06:50:38Z The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email MIK, Eliza The ‘traditional’ classi?cation into ‘instantaneous’ and ‘non-instantaneous’ methods of communication must be abandoned. As all Internet transmissions are instantaneous, the choice between the principle of receipt and the postal exception must be based on other criteria. The focus must be shifted from communication devices to the characteristics of the communication process. The latter resembles either dealings face-to-face or dealings at a distance. This simple division should remain the basis for all analyses. Instantaneity and control are two of many characteristics of face-to-face dealings and are not the only factors to be taken into account when making the choice between the principle and the postal exception. The focus must be shifted from the speed of transmission and the control of the communication process to the question whether the communication process is interactive and real-time. If the interaction resembles face-to-face dealings, the application of the principle is unquestionable. The postal acceptance rule can only be debated if the interaction does not resemble face-to-face dealings and one of the parties deserves protection from the risks of the communication method chosen by the other. 2009-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1054 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3006/viewcontent/1THEEFFECTIVENESSOFACCEPTANCESCOMMUNICATEDBYELECTRONICMEANS_NT.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University contract law e-commerce online contracting Contracts Internet Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
contract law e-commerce online contracting Contracts Internet Law |
spellingShingle |
contract law e-commerce online contracting Contracts Internet Law MIK, Eliza The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email |
description |
The ‘traditional’ classi?cation into ‘instantaneous’ and ‘non-instantaneous’ methods of communication must be abandoned. As all Internet transmissions are instantaneous, the choice between the principle of receipt and the postal exception must be based on other criteria. The focus must be shifted from communication devices to the characteristics of the communication process. The latter resembles either dealings face-to-face or dealings at a distance. This simple division should remain the basis for all analyses. Instantaneity and control are two of many characteristics of face-to-face dealings and are not the only factors to be taken into account when making the choice between the principle and the postal exception. The focus must be shifted from the speed of transmission and the control of the communication process to the question whether the communication process is interactive and real-time. If the interaction resembles face-to-face dealings, the application of the principle is unquestionable. The postal acceptance rule can only be debated if the interaction does not resemble face-to-face dealings and one of the parties deserves protection from the risks of the communication method chosen by the other. |
format |
text |
author |
MIK, Eliza |
author_facet |
MIK, Eliza |
author_sort |
MIK, Eliza |
title |
The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email |
title_short |
The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email |
title_full |
The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email |
title_fullStr |
The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Effectiveness of Acceptances Communicated by Electronic Means, Or – Does the Postal Acceptance Rule Apply to Email |
title_sort |
effectiveness of acceptances communicated by electronic means, or – does the postal acceptance rule apply to email |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1054 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3006/viewcontent/1THEEFFECTIVENESSOFACCEPTANCESCOMMUNICATEDBYELECTRONICMEANS_NT.pdf |
_version_ |
1772829656096964608 |